Effect of spreading center on likelihood to subduct

  • Thread starter Thread starter Riser38
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Center Likelihood
AI Thread Summary
In a discussion about the collision of two oceanic plates, the key point is that the plate furthest from its spreading center is likely to subduct due to its age, thickness, and density. As oceanic plates age, they become thicker and denser, making them heavier. Therefore, the plate that has traveled 4000 miles from its spreading center is expected to be older and will subduct under the plate that has traveled 2000 miles. This understanding is based on the principles of plate tectonics and the characteristics of oceanic crust as it ages.
Riser38
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Let's say that two oceanic plates run into each other in a head-on collision. Pretend that one is 2000 miles from its spreading center, and the other one is 4000 miles from its spreading center. My question to you is "which one of these would subduct and why?"

Bill in Miami
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I smell homework. Think about what happens to its thickness, elevation and density as it ages and you'll get your answer. You;ll probably have to assume the one that has traveled furthest is oldest
 
As far as I know, thickness and density increase with age and this would cause the plate to be heavier and thus subduct under the other. Does this make sense?
 
Yep, I'd say so :smile:
 
Thanks a ton!
 
Hello, I’m currently writing a series of essays on Pangaea, continental drift, and Earth’s geological cycles. While working on my research, I’ve come across some inconsistencies in the existing theories — for example, why the main pressure seems to have been concentrated in the northern polar regions. So I’m curious: is there any data or evidence suggesting that an external cosmic body (an asteroid, comet, or another massive object) could have influenced Earth’s geology in the distant...
On August 10, 2025, there was a massive landslide on the eastern side of Tracy Arm fjord. Although some sources mention 1000 ft tsunami, that height represents the run-up on the sides of the fjord. Technically it was a seiche. Early View of Tracy Arm Landslide Features Tsunami-causing slide was largest in decade, earthquake center finds https://www.gi.alaska.edu/news/tsunami-causing-slide-was-largest-decade-earthquake-center-finds...
Back
Top