Effects of centripetal force on longer objects

AI Thread Summary
When a long object, such as a person lassoed by their feet, is spun around, different parts experience varying tangential velocities due to their distance from the center of rotation. Upon cutting the rope, the center of mass will move in a straight line at the speed it had just before the cut, while the object continues to spin around its center of mass. This behavior is explained by the conservation of angular momentum, as no external torques are acting on the system. The moment of inertia plays a crucial role in determining how easily the object can be swung. Overall, the dynamics of long objects under centripetal force illustrate complex interactions between linear and angular motion.
Physics is awesome
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
I have a question. What will happen if you have a long object let’s say a person was lassoed by their feet and spun around by a super strong machine or person. Since the persons head of who is being spun is moving at a much faster tangential velocity then let’s say their feet. If the rope is cut what will happen since every part of the persons body has a different tangential velocity. Will the object start spinning. Will it move in a straight line at the median tangential speed between the head and the feet? Serious question long objects are never really discussed. You can also think of the same scenario with a long piece of wood spinning around in the circle since it obviously has the same angular velocity the molecules of the wood will have a faster tangential velocity farther out. This creates a mess of what will happen in my head maybe someone could better elaborate that understands what I am asking . Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is easy enough to verify. Go outside and swing a long stick in a circle and let it go. It will rotate after leaving your grip. Why? Conservation of angular momentum. Which way will it rotate? Did you know it is harder to swing an extended body of mass M than an equal mass body of compact shape? What does moment of inertial have to do with this? Check out the parallel axis theorem.
 
This is a good question. Here, angular momentum is conserved because there no torques acting. Before the rope is cut, the angular momentum is ##L_{before}=mvr+I_{CM}\omega## where the first term is the angular momentum of the center of mass, ##I_{CM}## is the moment of inertia about the center of mass, ##v## is the linear speed and ##\omega## is the angular speed. Note that the object goes around the circle at the same angular speed as it spins about its center of mass (##v=\omega r##). This is exactly what happens with the Moon that shows the same face to the Earth at all times. At the moment the rope is cut, the center of mass of the extended object will move in a straight line with speed ##v## along the direction of the velocity it had just before the rope was cut. As it does so, it will continue spinning about its CM with angular speed ##\omega##.
 
Physics is awesome said:
I have a question. What will happen if you have a long object let’s say a person was lassoed by their feet and spun around by a super strong machine or person. Since the persons head of who is being spun is moving at a much faster tangential velocity then let’s say their feet. If the rope is cut what will happen since every part of the persons body has a different tangential velocity. Will the object start spinning. Will it move in a straight line at the median tangential speed between the head and the feet? Serious question long objects are never really discussed. You can also think of the same scenario with a long piece of wood spinning around in the circle since it obviously has the same angular velocity the molecules of the wood will have a faster tangential velocity farther out. This creates a mess of what will happen in my head maybe someone could better elaborate that understands what I am asking . Thanks.

 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top