Efficiency and Power Calculation for a Moving Car

  • Thread starter Thread starter mouthwash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Input Power
AI Thread Summary
A 1200kg car accelerates from 4 m/s to 18 m/s over 12 meters in 6 seconds, using 75,000J of energy as heat. The correct power output is calculated using the change in kinetic energy, leading to a value of 12,800W. The efficiency is determined by comparing the useful work done to the total energy input, which includes both the work and the heat lost. The final efficiency calculation reveals a value of 71%. Accurate calculations require careful attention to the distinction between power and energy to avoid errors.
mouthwash
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A 1200kg car goes a distance of 12 meters on a road, going from 4m/s to 18 m/s in 6 seconds. If 75,000J of energy is used as heat energy, calculate power in/out and efficiency.



I believe I found the correct power output, by doing (.5)(1200)(14^2)/6 = 19600W, but I don't know how to find the power input. Would I just add in the energy lost to friction to the power output? I tried this (19600W /32100W * 100% = 61%) but according to the answer book this is the wrong answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, mouthwash!

(removed boldface because it is annoying :-p)

mouthwash said:
A 1200kg car goes a distance of 12 meters on a road, going from 4m/s to 18 m/s in 6 seconds. If 75,000J of energy is used as heat energy, calculate power in/out and efficiency.
I believe I found the correct power output, by doing (.5)(1200)(14^2)/6 = 19600W, but I don't know how to find the power input. Would I just add in the energy lost to friction to the power output? I tried this (19600W /32100W * 100% = 61%) but according to the answer book this is the wrong answer.

I don't think your power output is correct, unfortunately. The power is given by P = ΔE/Δt, the change in energy over the change in time. So you are correct about that. In this case, the energy is kinetic, associated with the car's motion. So ΔE would be ΔKE, which would be:

ΔKE = KEfinal - KEinitial

which would in turn be:

(1/2)m(vfinal)2 - (1/2)m(vinitial)2

Factoring things out, we'd end up with:

ΔKE = (1/2)m[ (vfinal)2 - (vinitial)2 ]

Look at the quantity in square brackets. It's not the same thing as what you wrote. You wrote (vfinal - vinitial)2, which is different, and wrong. You have to square the speeds first, and then subtract them. Instead, you subtracted the speeds, and then squared the result.
 
okay if I do it like that, I get answer for power output of 12800, but i still receive the wrong answer when i do 12800/(12800*6 + 75000) * 100% = 51%. The answer should be 71% for efficiency.
 
Also, the problem tells you that 75,000 J of energy from the engine ends up in the form of heat. So, a certain amount of energy is provided by the engine (over six seconds) but only some of that goes into useful work (which is the change in kinetic energy that you computed). The rest is wasted as heat. So the energy input would just be (useful work + waste heat). You can figure out the efficiency just from (energy out)/(energy in).
 
mouthwash said:
okay if I do it like that, I get answer for power output of 12800, but i still receive the wrong answer when i do 12800/(12800*6 + 75000) * 100% = 51%. The answer should be 71% for efficiency.

There are a couple of problems.

1. 12,800 W is the wrong answer for the power output. Try again.

2. You're mixing power and energy in your efficiency calculation (which is why you should ALWAYS include units in your computations, to avoid mistakes like this). :wink: EITHER use

efficiency = (power out)/(power in)

OR use

efficiency = (energy out)/(energy in)

It doesn't matter, because the second equation is just the first equation multiplied by (6 seconds)/(6 seconds) = 1.
 
I see, thanks a lot. I got the right answer finally.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top