Efficient Pendulum Pivoting for a Frictionless Physics Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter explorien86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
To create a pendulum with minimal friction for a physics experiment, using ball bearings to support the swinging shaft is recommended. A dense material like lead should be used for the pendulum bob to minimize air resistance. The string should be the thinnest and lightest option available, with silk being a suitable choice. A simple setup with a metal clamp can further reduce friction, as it limits the friction to the silk thread's bending. Overall, using lead for the bob and silk for the string is suggested for optimal performance.
explorien86
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
In my physics class we are working on an experiment that deals with energy (kinetic & potential) and right now we need to construct a swinging pendulum that has the least bit of friction to it possible. I have some basic concepts but he said it would cause to much friction that way. Would anyone here have any good ideas to make the pendulum swing with the least amount of friction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the immortal words of Fletch: "It's all ball bearings." You can get a relatively inexpensive roller or ball bearing to support the shaft that the pendulum swings on.

If you're not getting that in depth, tell us what your previous idea was and maybe we can expand on it.
 
To minimize air resistance, you want the densest material you can find for the bob. Most likely it would be lead. The string should be the thinnest and lightest combination that can hold the bob. Silk is a good option (available from a sewing/fabric shop. Sometimes simple is best: with a good metal clamp (clamped between two flat metal strips) the only friction is the interior friction of the silk thread bending. THis is very small.

Lead and silk; that's my suggestion.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top