Eigenvalue/Orthogonal Eigenfunctions

  • Thread starter Thread starter jegues
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenfunctions
jegues
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



See figure attached for problem statement.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



See figure attached for attempt.

I'm confused as to how to do part B?

I know that the definition of orthogonal is,

\int_\alpha ^{\beta}f(x)g(x) = 0

but how do I obtain f(x) and g(x)

Do I just choose two n values such as n=1, and n=2, plug it in and obtain my 2 functions and preform the integral?

Thanks again!

Whoops! There the figure should be attached now.
 

Attachments

  • 2009Q7.jpg
    2009Q7.jpg
    28.2 KB · Views: 419
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No picture.
 
LCKurtz said:
No picture.

It's there now, still looking for some help on this one.
 
jegues said:

Homework Statement



See figure attached for problem statement.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



See figure attached for attempt.

I'm confused as to how to do part B?

I know that the definition of orthogonal is,

\int_\alpha ^{\beta}f(x)g(x) = 0

but how do I obtain f(x) and g(x)

Do I just choose two n values such as n=1, and n=2, plug it in and obtain my 2 functions and preform the integral?

Thanks again!

Whoops! There the figure should be attached now.

LCKurtz said:
No picture.

jegues said:
It's there now, still looking for some help on this one.

Basically, yes, except you don't plug in numbers for n and m. You need to show

\int_0^1 \sin(\frac{(2n-1)\pi x}{2})\sin(\frac{(2m-1)\pi x}{2})\, dx = 0,\, m\ne n

[Edit] Fixed typo; put x's in the integrals
 
Last edited:
LCKurtz said:
Basically, yes, except you don't plug in numbers for n and m. You need to show

\int_0^1 \sin(\frac{(2n-1)\pi}{2})\sin(\frac{(2m-1)\pi}{2})\, dx = 0,\, m\ne n

Hmmm...

\text{Since, }\quad m,n \in Z

m \neq n

So the integral should always come out in one of two cases,

\int_0^1 -dx \quad\text{or, } \quad \int_0^1 dx

Neither gives 0.

What am I doing wrong/misunderstanding?
 
Try defining the indices like:

2n-1 = k and 2m-1 = j or something. (k=1,3,5,... and j=1,3,5,...). Then try making use of the trig identity

sin(jx)sin(kx) = (1/2)[ cos((j-k)x) - cos((j+k)x) ]

in the integrand.
 
jegues said:
Hmmm...

\text{Since, }\quad m,n \in Z

m \neq n

So the integral should always come out in one of two cases,

\int_0^1 -dx \quad\text{or, } \quad \int_0^1 dx

Neither gives 0.

What am I doing wrong/misunderstanding?

Woops. I inadvertently left the x's out of the sine functions.
They aren't constant and I edited it.
 
haselwhat? said:
Try defining the indices like:

2n-1 = k and 2m-1 = j or something. (k=1,3,5,... and j=1,3,5,...). Then try making use of the trig identity

sin(jx)sin(kx) = (1/2)[ cos((j-k)x) - cos((j+k)x) ]

in the integrand.

How does this translate to the RHS of the equation?

What identity are you using you change to two sin terms into two cos terms?
 
Last edited:
Its just a trig identity I used once to show orthogonality. Hopefully it makes the integration easier and hopefully gives zero, which is your "RHS", right?
 
Back
Top