Eigenvalue problem with operators as matrix elements

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a specific eigenvalue problem involving a matrix with operators as its elements. The user seeks to find the eigenfrequency and eigenvectors, specifically questioning the dependence of the eigenvalue \(\omega\) on \(x\). Clarifications are requested regarding the notation, particularly the use of partial derivatives and the interpretation of \(\omega\). Participants emphasize the need for precise definitions and the implications of the problem's structure on the solutions for \(a(x)\) and \(b(x)\). The conversation highlights the importance of clear communication in mathematical problem-solving.
wil3
Messages
177
Reaction score
1
Hello, I have a feeling that the solution to this question is going to be incredibly obvious, so my apologies if this turns out to be really dumb. How do I solve the following eigenvalue problem:

<br /> <br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \partial_x^2 + \mu + u(x) &amp; u(x)^2 \\<br /> \bar{u(x)}^2 &amp; \partial_x^2 + \mu + u(x)<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> a(x)\\<br /> b(x)<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> =<br /> \omega(x)<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> a(x)\\<br /> b(x)<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />

where all x dependencies have been declared. I know the definition of the function u(x), but I need to solve for the eigenfrequency and eigenvectors.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
wil3 said:
Hello, I have a feeling that the solution to this question is going to be incredibly obvious, so my apologies if this turns out to be really dumb. How do I solve the following eigenvalue problem:

<br /> <br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> \partial_x^2 + \mu + u(x) &amp; u(x)^2 \\<br /> \bar{u(x)}^2 &amp; \partial_x^2 + \mu + u(x)<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> a(x)\\<br /> b(x)<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br /> =<br /> \omega(x)<br /> \begin{bmatrix}<br /> a(x)\\<br /> b(x)<br /> \end{bmatrix}<br />

where all x dependencies have been declared. I know the definition of the function u(x), but I need to solve for the eigenfrequency and eigenvectors.
I assume that you mean to find the function omega of x? You need to specify, because it's unclear what you want. Is your use of del indicating a partial derivative or a directional derivative. Be specific.
 
Typo in question: \omega should not depend on x. I want to solve for \omega, hence why I am calling this an eigenvalue problem. I'm not sure if getting w will also give a and b, like in a standard linear system.

\partial_x indicates a partial derivative, which is standard notation in physics for this sort of problem. But the problem would be identical if you wanted to interpret that as a directional derivative (both because the problem is one dimensional and because the subscript x would suggest a derivative in the x direction).
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top