Eigenvalues of nonlinearly coupled equations

nbachela
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I am currently dealing with a nonlinear system of coupled equations. In fact I had performed a perturbation approach for this system which is highly nonlinear. Thanks to first step of the perturbative approach I could reach eigenvalues in the "linear case". Right now I want to move to next order of the perturbative approach, thus I must deal with nonlinear terms. Even if the system is nonlinear, physically speaking eigenvalues must exist, but I have no ideas how I could compute them.

Of course the system has many equations, but in order to simplify it a bit, I only consider two coupled equations:

Ω_1*E_1 + K_{11} |E_1|^2 E_1 + K_{12} |E_2|^2 E_1 = 0
Ω_2*E_2 + K_{21} |E_1|^2 E_2 + K_{22} |E_2|^2 E_2 = 0

Ω_1, Ω_2 are eigenvalues in the linear case. In nonlinear case, the coupling is performed by K_{ij} terms.

I wonder if someone knows a analytical approach of this problem? And if there is no such method, is there an iterative or numerical approach which leads to computable solutions?

Best
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are those factors real or complex numbers?
If yes, it looks like you can divide the first equation by E_1 and the second one by E_2. Afterwards, you have linear equations in the squared values.
If no, what are they?
 
Hi,

Thanks to your last reply I just realize I made a mistake. The Ω are not constant values. In fact the system correspond to coupled differential equations:

dE_1/dt+ω_1*E_1 + K_{11} |E_1|^2 E_1 + K_{12} |E_2|^2 E_1 = 0
dE_2/dt+ω_2*E_2 + K_{21} |E_1|^2 E_2 + K_{22} |E_2|^2 E_2 = 0

Sorry for the mistake.


Best
 
Okay, and what are you looking for now? General solutions E1(t), E2(t)? Some special solutions? E1, E2 where the derivatives vanish? The last case could be reduced to the suggestion in my previous post.
 
In fact I would like to compute the eigensolutions of this system. I am not sure I can even talk about eigenvalue for a non linear system.

To tell the whole story, I need to compute mode of a particular multimode laser, so this eigensolutions have a physical meaning (they corresponds to emitted modes). In fact my system is much more complicated, but I have simplified it a bit. In real, it is not possible to divide by E_i in all the equations because of coupling terms. If I write the system for 3 coupled modes, it would look like this:

dE_1/dt+ω_1*E_1 + K_{11} |E_1|^2 E_1 + K_{12} |E_2|^2 E_1 + K_{13} |E_3|^2 E_1 + K_{123} E_1*E_2*E_3= 0
dE_2/dt+ω_2*E_2 + K_{21} |E_1|^2 E_2 + K_{22} |E_2|^2 E_2 + K_{23} |E_3|^2 E_2 + K_{231} E_1*E_2*E_3 = 0
dE_3/dt+ω_2*E_2 + K_{31} |E_1|^2 E_3 + K_{32} |E_2|^2 E_3 + K_{33} |E_2|^3 E_3 + K_{312} E_1*E_2*E_3= 0



I would like to know if there is an analytical or iterative way to solve such system?
 
Iterative way: Sure. For each step in time, calculate dE_i/dt, let it evolve to the next step and repeat.
Those expanded equations still have E_i as common factor in equation i.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top