Eigenvectors of rotation matrix

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the eigenvectors of the rotation matrix \(\Omega\) defined as \(\Omega = \left[ \begin{array}{cc} \cos{\theta} & \sin{\theta} \\ -\sin{\theta} & \cos{\theta} \end{array} \right]\) with eigenvalues \(e^{i\theta}\) and \(e^{-i\theta}\). The user initially miscalculated the relationship between the components of the eigenvector, leading to the incorrect conclusion that \(x_1 = x_2 = 0\). After clarification, the correct eigenvectors were identified as \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c} 1 \\ i \end{array} \right]\) and \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c} i \\ 1 \end{array} \right]\), confirming the validity of the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra.
  • Familiarity with rotation matrices and their properties.
  • Basic knowledge of complex numbers and their manipulation.
  • Proficiency in matrix operations and transformations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors for different types of matrices.
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of rotation matrices in two dimensions.
  • Explore the application of eigenvectors in quantum mechanics, particularly in quantum state transformations.
  • Investigate the normalization of eigenvectors and its significance in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, as well as mathematicians and engineers dealing with linear transformations and matrix theory.

timon
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This question is from Principles of Quantum Mechanics by R. Shankar.

Given the operator (matrix) \Omega with eigenvalues e^{i\theta} and e^{-i\theta}, I am told to find the corresponding eigenvectors.

Homework Equations



<br /> \Omega = \left[ \begin{array}{cc}<br /> \cos{\theta} &amp; \sin{\theta} \\<br /> -\sin{\theta} &amp; \cos{\theta} \\<br /> \end{array} \right]<br />
<br /> \Omega \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \\<br /> x_2 \\<br /> \end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \cos{\theta} + x_2 \sin{\theta} \\<br /> -x_1 \sin{\theta} + x_2 \cos{\theta} \\<br /> \end{array}<br /> \right] <br />
<br /> e^{i\theta} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \\<br /> x_2 \\<br /> \end{array} \right] = \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> x_1 \cos{\theta} + x_1 i\sin{\theta} \\<br /> x_2 \cos{\theta} + x_2 i\sin{\theta} \\<br /> \end{array}\right]<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I let the matrix operate on the generic vector (x_1, x_2)^T and demand that the resulting vector is equal to (e^{i\theta}x_1, e^{i\theta}x_2)^T. From this i get the condition that x_2 = ix_2and x_1 = -ix_2, which implies that x_1 = x_2 = 0. Am i missing something crucial?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
timon said:

The Attempt at a Solution



I let the matrix operate on the generic vector (x_1, x_2)^T and demand that the resulting vector is equal to (e^{i\theta}x_1, e^{i\theta}x_2)^T. From this i get the condition that x_2 = ix_2and x_1 = -ix_2,
Typo? I think you mean x_2 = ix_1 here. In which case these two equations are really the same equation.

which implies that x_1 = x_2 = 0. Am i missing something crucial?
No, it does not imply that. Let x1=1 (and worry about normalization later), then what is x2?
 
Thanks for the quick reply. That actually wasn't a typo. I managed to switch the indices the same way in three separate calculations, getting the same erroneous result each time. Are these the correct eigenvectors?

<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> 1 \\<br /> i \\<br /> \end{array} \right] ,<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> i \\<br /> 1 \\<br /> \end{array} \right] <br />
 
Are these the correct eigenvectors?

<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> 1 \\<br /> i \\<br /> \end{array} \right] ,<br /> \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left[ \begin{array}{c}<br /> i \\<br /> 1 \\<br /> \end{array} \right] <br />
Yes, that's right.

timon said:
Thanks for the quick reply. That actually wasn't a typo. I managed to switch the indices the same way in three separate calculations, getting the same erroneous result each time.
That's weird. From your equations in Post #1, you get
x_1 \cos{\theta} + x_2\sin{\theta} = x_1 \cos{\theta} + x_1 i\sin{\theta}
which by inspection implies x_2 = i x_1, not x_2 = i x_2
 
It is indeed quite amazing that I managed to screw the same trivial manipulation up three times in a row, always in the same manner. Thank you for the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K