Eikonal Approximation: Find total Scattering Cross Section

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Using the Eikonal approximation
(1) Determine the expression for the total scattering cross section of a particle in a potential V(r)
(2) Using this result, compute the total scattered cross section for the following potential.

<br /> V(r)=<br /> \begin{cases}<br /> V_0, \text{for } r &lt; a \\<br /> 0 , \text{for } r &gt;a<br /> \end{cases}<br />

Where ##V_0 > 0##

Homework Equations



The differential cross section is given by..

1.) \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}= |f(\vec{k}&#039;,\vec{k})|^2

Where ##f(\vec{k}',\vec{k})## is the scattering amplitude.

2.) The optical theorem is a easy way to find the total scattered cross section from a potential. It is given by..

\text{Im}\left(f(\theta=0)\right)=\frac{\sigma_{tot}}{4\pi}

3.) The expression for the Eikonal approximation is..

f(\vec{k}&#039;,\vec{k})=-i k \int_0^{\infty}db b J_0(kb\theta)[e^{2 i \Delta(b)}-1]

Where..

\Delta(b)=\frac{-m}{2k\hbar^2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}V(\sqrt{b^2+z^2})dz

Where ##V(\sqrt{b^2+z^2})## means ##V## OF ##\sqrt{b^2+z^2}##, not times.

##b## is the impact parameter, and in the book they say that ##l## can be treated as a continuous variable since we are at high energies, and they say that ##l = bk ##. Not sure if this helps.

The Attempt at a Solution



I used the optical theorem (equation 2) to get..

\sigma_{tot}=4 \pi \text{Im} \left(f(\vec{k}&#039;,\vec{k})\right)=-4 \pi k \int_0^{\infty}db b J_0(kb\theta)[\text{Re}(e^{2i\Delta(b)})-1]_{\theta=0}

So it seems that all I would need to do is calculate the integral, but I am having trouble finding ##\Delta(b)## because the limits are infinity. When I plug in the potential I get..

\Delta(b)=\frac{-m}{2k\hbar^2}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}V_0dz

Which diverges? Clearly the limits simplify to something that's not infinity on both ends. But the variable of integration is z, which has no limit in either direction. I found some examples, but the ones I found use the gaussian potential and do not change the limits of integration.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The range of integration should be: b²+z²<a² .
 
So I guess the integration is only over the scatterer?

So if I have ##b^2+z^2=a^2 \rightarrow z=\sqrt{a^2-b^2}##. So the limits of integration should be from ##z=-\sqrt{a^2-b^2}## to ##z=\sqrt{a^2-b^2}##?
 
The limits are over the whole space.
But your potential V(r) is not.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top