Einstein Tensor Divergence Proof: How to Show it is Divergence-Free?

  • Thread starter Thread starter teddd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence Tensor
teddd
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone!
I'm having a lillle problem proving that the einstein tensor is divergence free!
I don't know how to begin, i start with
\nabla_\mu G^{\mu\nu}=\nabla_{\mu}(R^ {\mu\nu} -\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}R)
i tried to do \nabla_\mu G^{\mu\nu}=\nabla_{\mu}g^{\mu\nu}(g_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}R)
(by the way, is that right? I guess no becaouse then I get to g^{mu\nu}(\nabla_{\mu}(R-\frac{1}{2}R))=\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}\frac{\partial R}{\partial \mu} which i guess never goes to zero!)can you help me out?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You index manipulations are incorrect. You can't have an index repeated more than twice.

The way to get the divergence of the Einstein tensor is to start with the second Bianchi identity of the Riemann tensor, and then contract the upper index with one of the lower ones.
 
Thanks pal, I had already figured the doubly contracted Bianchi identity thing out, but I wanted to know where was the mistake in that!

But why I can't repeat an index more than twice? I guess becaouse it clashes against the summation convention isnt'it?
 
Yes. In that case, it's not clear over which indices you should sum.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top