Einstein's formula for specific heat

Piano man
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I'm working through a derivation of Einstein's formula for specific heat and I'm stuck.

So far I've been working off Planck's assumption of quantised energy E=n\hbar\omega and the energy probability P(E)= e^{\frac{-E}{k_b T}}, using the fact that the mean expectation energy is \langle E \rangle= \frac{\sum_n E P(E)}{\sum_n P(E)} to get total energy U=3N\langle E \rangle=\frac{3N\sum_n n\hbar\omega e^{-n\hbar\omega/k_b T}}{\sum_n e^{-n\hbar\omega/k_b T}}

The next step is where my problem is. The derivation I am studying says the above expression is equal to 3Nk_b T\left[\frac{\hbar\omega/k_b T}{e^{\hbar\omega/k_bT}-1}\right], which when differentiated wrt T gives the Einstein formula, but I don't see how that step is made.

Any ideas?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't found how to derive the result from your way yet, but here is an idea:
The numerator is somewhat like A = e^{-1} + 2e^{-2} + ... and the denominator is somewhat like B = 1 + e^{-1} + e^{-2} + ...
Notice that: A = (B-1) + (B-1)e^{-1} + (B-1)e^{-2} + ... and that B is a geometric series and easily computed.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top