Elastic collision between two moving objects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving an elastic collision problem involving a 0.2 kg block and a 0.6 kg block. The participant correctly identifies that both momentum and kinetic energy are conserved during the collision and sets up the necessary equations. However, they realize there are three unknowns, making it impossible to solve without additional information, specifically the initial velocity of the 0.6 kg block. The conversation confirms that without this data, the problem cannot be solved, even in the case of a completely inelastic collision. Additional details are necessary to proceed with the calculations.
captainmustard
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 0.2 kg block, moving at 6 m/s, is catching up and colliding elastically with a 0.6 kg block that is moving along the same line and in the same direction. Find the velocities of the ball after this one-dimensional collision.


Homework Equations


Conservation of momentum, conservation of energy


The Attempt at a Solution


First, I figured the momentum and kinetic energy would be conserved so I setup a couple of equations:

m1v1i + m2v2i = m1v1f + m2v2f
and
m1v1i^2 + m2v2i^2 = m1v1f^2 + m2v2f^2

At this point, I realize I have 3 unknowns (v2i, v1f and v2f) and I simply don't know what I can even do with this information. Any ideas at all would be helpful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, captainmustard. Welcome to PF!

You are right. There is not enough information to answer the question. You have set up the correct equations.
 
Thank you for the response. I thought I was going crazy for a moment there. Would this be possible if it were a completely inelastic collision? I would imagine it would involve some tedious algebra if so.
 
No, you need the initial velocity of the 0.6 kg ball, too.

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top