Elastic Collisions: billiard ball problem with a twist

AI Thread Summary
In this discussion about an elastic collision involving two billiard balls, the problem presents a 10 kg ball colliding with a stationary 5 kg ball, with specified angles post-collision. The participant questions whether to use the kinetic energy equation alongside momentum conservation equations, given the angles provided. It is clarified that the conservation of momentum alone is sufficient to solve for the final velocities due to the known angles, making the kinetic energy equation unnecessary in this case. However, upon calculating the final speeds, it is noted that the total energy exceeds the initial kinetic energy, suggesting an inconsistency in the problem setup. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding conservation principles in collision problems.
Benny851
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A billiard ball ( mass = 10kg, initial velocity is 5 m/s) is launched along x-axis at a stationary billiard ball ( mass = 5kg). After collision, the first ball goes off at 30 degree angle above x-axis and 2nd ball goes off at 45 degree angle below x-axis. Calculate the final velocities of both billiard balls.

Homework Equations



M1V1 + M2V2 = M1V1final + M2V2final (conservation of momentum)

1/2M1V1^2 + 1/2M2V2^2 = 1/2M1V1final + 1/2M2V2^2


The Attempt at a Solution



Typically in most billiard ball problems you are not given both angle measurements, which means you need 3 equations: momentum in x direction, momentum in y direction and Kinetic energy. But, in this case I only have 2 unknowns, not 3. So my question is whether I need to even use the third kinetic energy equation? I don't understand how I can solve for 2 unknowns by using 3 equations. My gut tells me just to use the 2 momentum equations, which is what I have been doing, but whenever I read about elastic collision problems I see that KE equation is also used. Some guidance on this topic would be really appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum is always conserved, so if here is enough information given to solve the problem using only conservation of momentum, go for it!
 
Your reasoning is correct, there's no need for the kinetic energy equations precisely because you know the angles they went off on. It's really just a way to test your understanding, to make sure you appreciate the underlying concept (conservation of linear momentum) by changing the usual form of the question. Mathematically, it's an example of what's sometimes called an overdetermined system (more equations than unknowns). Of course, once you know the final velocities you can then go ahead and calculate the kinetic energies, if you wished.
 
The initial kinetic energy is 125 J. When I work out the final speeds of the two balls using conservation of momentum, the total energy is a bit more than 125 J. So the directions given for the balls after the collision is not quite possible.

AM
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top