Electric and Magnetic Fields: A Proton's Motion

AI Thread Summary
A proton moving with constant velocity in a gravity-free space can experience both electric and magnetic fields. The discussion highlights that while option D (both fields present) is valid, option C (a magnetic field alone) is also correct if the magnetic field is aligned with the proton's velocity, resulting in zero net force. The participants clarify that the cross product of parallel vectors leads to no change in velocity, validating option C. The interaction of crossed fields, where electric and magnetic fields cancel each other, is also emphasized. Ultimately, the conclusion is that both C and D can coexist under specific conditions.
Tanishq Nandan
Messages
122
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A proton moves with constant velocity in a certain region of gravity-free space.Which one of the following conclusions is valid?
A)There must be no electric field or magnetic fields in the region.
B)There could be an electric field without any magnetic field.
C)There could be a magnetic field without any electric field.
D)There can be an electric field as well as magnetic field.

Homework Equations


Force on a charged particle=(charge on particle)× (Vector cross product of it's velocity vector and Magnetic field vector)
F=qE,for a particle in an electric field.
If the 2 fields(magnetic and electric) are perpendicular to each other,then they are said to be crossed fields,and their effects cancel out each other.

The Attempt at a Solution


I know D is correct for sure,that's what crossed fields is all about.
If we apply an electric and a magnetic field at right angles to each other,their effects cancel out each other and the velocity of the particle will remain unaffected.
But,the answer is given (C), (D)

How is C valid?
A magnetic field,on it's own should change the direction of the particle(hence changing it's velocity).
Hence,my problem.. (does it have something to do with gravity free space??)
Help appreciated..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tanishq Nandan said:
How is C valid?
A magnetic field,on it's own should change the direction of the particle(hence changing it's velocity).
Consider the formula you stated for the force due to the charge moving through a magnetic field. Why are there vectors involved? :wink:
 
Ooo...ok,thanks
 
Tanishq Nandan said:
Ooo...ok,thanks
OK. What is your overall conclusion ?
 
SammyS said:
OK. What is your overall conclusion ?
Well,I didn't notice that if you place a magnetic field in the direction of the particle's velocity,the net force on it becomes zero(Cross product of two parallel vectors is zero),and there is obviously no electric field involved.So,C is also correct,hadn't thought of that before
 
  • Like
Likes gneill
Tanishq Nandan said:
Well,I didn't notice that if you place a magnetic field in the direction of the particle's velocity,the net force on it becomes zero(Cross product of two parallel vectors is zero),and there is obviously no electric field involved.So,C is also correct,hadn't thought of that before
Excellent !
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top