Electric Car Internal Design & Engines

AI Thread Summary
Electric cars utilize motors instead of traditional engines, with key components including batteries, controllers, and either AC or DC motors. The discussion highlights the dominance of lithium-ion batteries due to their higher energy density compared to lead-acid batteries, which are less economically viable for electric vehicles. The Chevy Volt is mentioned as a significant example, relying on lithium batteries and facing challenges in production costs. Concerns about the development timeline for battery technology and the need for rigorous testing before market release are also noted. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the ongoing evolution and challenges in electric vehicle design and battery technology.
Xalos
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Anyone with any idea about the basic internal design & engines in an electric car?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
What research have you done so far? What do you know about the subject? If you have specific questions, that would be easier for us to address. Start by reading some background material:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_car
 
Electric cars don't have engines, they have motors. Try asking more specific questions.

- Warren
 
Well the basic components are batteries, a controller, and an AC or DC electric motor. Batteries are usually Lead Acid, but more recently NiMH or Lithium. The controller varies only the current to the motor. Voltages are over 100V. Motors are usually adapted DC or AC industrial process motors. Some can do 1/4 miles in under 10 seconds, but I doubt they have much range. The Chevy Volt uses lithium batteries with an AC motor.
 
ronmann said:
...The Chevy Volt uses lithium batteries with an AC motor.
I read somewhere that Chevy would not go to full production on the volt unless they could get the price down on batteries, the Li ion technology is apparently still too expensive. Anyone corroborate?
 
Yes, that's right. There is a tour of the development centre in a magazine a just got. Basically, there are 2 major companies competing for the battery contract. They said it was difficult to develop it backwards compared to a normal car since the whole car will be ready before the power plant is developed. This way the car will launch as soon as the technology is available, and they will be the first to have a Li ion car on the road. They plan to lose money on during the first few years that they sell the Chevy Volt. Its more about building an image.
 
ronmann said:
Yes, that's right. There is a tour of the development centre in a magazine a just got. Basically, there are 2 major companies competing for the battery contract. They said it was difficult to develop it backwards compared to a normal car since the whole car will be ready before the power plant is developed. This way the car will launch as soon as the technology is available, and they will be the first to have a Li ion car on the road. ...
Hmm. Usually car makers require a component to be tested out to half its expected life before it hits the assem. line. Thus a 10yr life battery system would be expected to run in the lab for 5yrs, or under some kind of accelerated environment that simulates that period. If they follow procedure they're still ~5 yrs away.
 
ronmann said:
Yes, that's right. There is a tour of the development centre in a magazine a just got. Basically, there are 2 major companies competing for the battery contract.
A123 and Valence?
 
I have a hard time accepting that auto designers can't produce a design that gives us what is needed by 80+ % of the population, it seems that perfection and efficiency are sought after to the extent we price ourselves out of what we want.
Putting together a lead acid system should be possible, that can produce 150 or so miles per day, with 75% or more of the total weight below the center of gravity, rollovers would be almost eliminated, and the battery system could be enclosed to such extent, that an accident would involve no more than replacement of wheels, and maybe the body.
Batteries can be designed with the intent of servicing them, the extra weight can be used to other advantages.
IMHO the lead acid battery still has a few design changes, that can be made, that will invoke the question "why didn't we think of that sooner?":rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
  • #10
RonL said:
I have a hard time accepting that auto designers can't produce a design that gives us what is needed by 80+ % of the population, it seems that perfection and efficiency are sought after to the extent we price ourselves out of what we want.
Putting together a lead acid system should be possible, that can produce 150 or so miles per day, ...
No its not economically possible. Lead acid has about 1/10 the energy density (kilowatt-hrs/kg) of Lithium ion. The extra weight is not a benign problem of mass distribution. More weight requires more power to accelerate it which requires more batteries and so on. For example, the Li-ion batteries on the Chevy Volt are now just enough to travel 40miles - commuter range. The batteries appear to take up about one M^3 and about ~300lbs(?) if I recall. Replacing that w/ lead acid would take 10X the battery weight alone; such a car is not going anywhere.
 
  • #11
I do need to extend an apology to the engineering group, as i tend to forget about the safety, and foolproof design they have to comply with. (a very nice looking car)
Do you have any cost comparisons between the batteries? a little over two years ago i purchased twelve 12 volt deep cycle marine batteries, 100 Ah each, their weight is a little over 750 pounds, and after tax my cost about 850.00 US. The project fell apart and i have used them from time to time in other ways, and hope to put them in service before the summer heat is on, in an attempt to store some solar energy for my home. I have every thing except a nice solar panel to set up a pretty good system.
I have gotten as much as 6-7 years service, on some of my heavy equipment batteries, and i believe some of the negative press of lead acid comes from, people spending too little and expecting too much.
Because i tend to ramble, maybe i should start a blog.:zzz:

Thanks for your answer, and the reference to the Volt. My guess is it will sale for more than 60,000$ ?? Oh well its our future trend:smile:
 
  • #12
RonL said:
Do you have any cost comparisons between the batteries? a little over two years ago i purchased twelve 12 volt deep cycle marine batteries, 100 Ah each, their weight is a little over 750 pounds, and after tax my cost about 850.00 US.

http://spectrum.ieee.org/sep07/5490/3" Sept 2007
(maybe subscription only)
IEEE Spectrum said:
...Then there’s the final hurdle: cost. At the moment, 12-V lead-acid batteries cost US $40 to $50 per kWh. Nickel-cadmium and nickel-metal-hydride cells for portable electronics cost $350/kWh; lithium-ion cells for the same market go for $450/kWh. Move to hybrid vehicles, though, and the price for longer-lived, more rugged nickel-metal-hydride batteries shoots up to about $700/kWh. That’s more than double the $300 target set by the U.S. Advanced Battery Consortium for automotive lithium-ion packs.
A commuter car needs 12KWh, very roughly.

RonL said:
I have gotten as much as 6-7 years service, on some of my heavy equipment batteries, and i believe some of the negative press of lead acid comes from, people spending too little and expecting too much.:
Then that's not from deep cycles, must be pulse operation (starting cars) or idling for backup. Deep cycle those lead acid's many times and they are done, time for another $800.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top