Electric Charge Problem - Book error?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving four charged particles arranged in a square, where the goal is to determine the ratio Q/q under specific conditions of electrostatic force balance. The user finds a discrepancy between their calculated value of Q/q and the solution provided in the solutions manual, leading to confusion about the correctness of their approach. They consistently derive Q/q = -1/(2√2) for particle 3, while the solutions manual states it should be -2√2. The user questions whether the same result should be obtainable through different methods for both particles 1 and 3, suggesting a potential misunderstanding of the problem setup. Clarifications are sought regarding the forces acting on the particles and whether all necessary forces have been accounted for.
PFStudent
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
Hit enter a bit too fast for the title.

TITLE: Electric Charge Problem - Book Error?


Homework Statement



6. In Fig. 21-22, four particles form a square. The charges are q_{1} = q_{4} = Q and q_{2} = q_{3} = q.
(a) What is Q/q if the net electrostatic force on particles 1 and 3 is zero?
(b) Is there any value of q that makes the net electrostatic force on each of the four particles zero? Explain.

http://img509.imageshack.us/img509/3158/61me0.png

Homework Equations



<br /> \displaystyle{\left|\vec{F}_{12}\right| = \frac{k \left|q_{1}\right|\left|q_{2}\right|}{r_{12}^2}}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



I've actually worked through this already however, I am in conflict with how the problem is stated.

Essentially all one has to do for part (a) is find Q/q, and the problem already states that the net forces on particles 1 and 3 are zero. Therefore, from the picture several conclusions can be made. In order for the net forces on particles 1 and 3 to be zero, charges Q and q must be unlike-sign.

Next, because the problem states that the net force for particles 1 and 3 is zero, either particle can be used to find Q/q.

Continuing on, therefore choosing particle three for example, we need to break the forces acting on three due to the other three particles into components (Fx and Fy).

From here the net force on three is zero, and therefore demands Fx and Fy be zero aswell.

Now, either approach to summing up the components for net: Fx or Fy will lead to one of the summed components being zero.

Choosing Fy, we arrive at N.III.L.

<br /> \left|\vec{F}_{31}\right| = \frac{\left|\vec{F}_{32}\right|}{\sqrt{2}}}<br />

Now from here its simple algebra.

<br /> \displaytype{\frac{\left|Q\right|}{\left|q\right|}} = \displaytype{\frac{1}{2\sqrt{2}}}<br />

and noting that Q and q must be unlike-sign, the above reduces to

<br /> \displaytype{\frac{Q}{q}} = \displaytype{\frac{-1}{2\sqrt{2}}}<br />

However, the correct answer (from the solutions manual (SM)) is

<br /> \displaytype{\frac{Q}{q}} = \displaytype{-2\sqrt{2}}<br />

The SM shows arrives at this solution through resolving the Fx components for the net force on particle 1.

So here is the problem, I can get the same answer (\displaytype{\frac{Q}{q}} = \displaytype{-2\sqrt{2}}) if I resolve either component (Fx or Fy) for particle 1.

However, I do not get the same answer when I resolve the components (either Fx or Fy) for particle 3.

I consistently get \displaytype{\frac{Q}{q}} = \displaytype{\frac{-1}{2\sqrt{2}}} for particle 3.

Also, I will try resolving the net Fx component on particle 3 and see what I get.

SO, technically for this problem shouldn't I be able to get the same answer (Q/q), through all four ways; that is resolving the two components (Fx and Fy) for each particle (1 and 3)?

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF. You need to show some of your own work in order for us to help you. The relevant equation that you list is a good start. Now draw the square and start drawing the forces. Are you sure you've listed all the particles? Seems like it would be hard to get the forces to cancel with just 4 particles at the vertices of a square...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top