- #1

- 226

- 4

- The electromagnetic and strong interactions have gauge bosons with no electric charge that are massless; and
- The weak interaction has two massive gauge bosons which do have electric charge.

^{0}gauge boson fit in?

IH

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Islam Hassan
- Start date

- #1

- 226

- 4

- The electromagnetic and strong interactions have gauge bosons with no electric charge that are massless; and
- The weak interaction has two massive gauge bosons which do have electric charge.

IH

- #2

Doug Huffman

Gold Member

- 804

- 111

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_particles#Bosons

- #3

- 453

- 15

If there is a significance to this 'observation' then where does the Z

- The electromagnetic and strong interactions have gauge bosons with no electric charge that are massless; and
- The weak interaction has two massive gauge bosons which do have electric charge.
^{0}gauge boson fit in?

IH

Do you mean why would *weak* gauge bosons have *electric* charge? Sure, there is a good reason; it is because the weak and electromagnetic interaction are unified in electroweak theory.

In pure unbroken gauge theories, all the gauge bosons are only charged under whatever gauge group it is which generates them (except for U(1) gauge bosons), and they are all massless. So gluons have no weak or electric charge because QCD is essentially completely separate to electroweak theory. The same logic doesn't apply to the electroweak sector because of electroweak symmetry breaking, and it is the particular way in which it is broken which leaves you with some neutral and some charged electroweak gauge bosons, and also generates masses for some of them.

- #4

samalkhaiat

Science Advisor

- 1,736

- 1,045

Is there any significance to the fact that:

The electromagnetic and strong interactions have gauge bosons with no electric charge that are massless; and

It simply means that the [itex]U_{em}(1)[/itex] and [itex]SU_{c}(3)[/itex] gauge fields are REAL fields.

Weak interaction is the result of gauging the global [itex]SU(2)\times U(1)[/itex] symmetry. The GAUGE group [itex]SU(2)[/itex] has 3 REAL MASSLESS gauge FIELDS [itex]W^{ i }_{ \mu }[/itex], [itex]i = 1, 2 , 3[/itex]. Therefore, they have no em charge. The corresponding MASIVE and CHARGED gauge BOSONS (don't confuse them with gauge fields) of the weak interaction are the following combinationsThe weak interaction has two massive gauge bosons which do have electric charge. If there is a significance to this 'observation' then where does the Z^{0}gauge boson fit in?

[tex]W^{\pm}_{ \mu } = \frac{ 1 }{ \sqrt{ 2 } } ( W^{1}_{ \mu } \mp i W^{ 2 }_{ \mu } )[/tex]

These are charged because they are complex fields, i.e. they admit a GLOBAL [itex]U(1)[/itex] symmetry. The 3rd gauge BOSON has no charge because it is given by the follwing REAL combination

[tex]Z^{0}_{ \mu } = W^{ 3 }_{ \mu } \sin \theta - B_{ \mu } \cos \theta ,[/tex]

where [itex]B_{ \mu }[/itex] is a MASSLESS REAL [itex]U(1)[/itex] gauge FIELD.

Sam

Last edited:

- #5

samalkhaiat

Science Advisor

- 1,736

- 1,045

No, there are 3 of them. There are, always, as many gague fields as there are generators of the gauge group.The weak interaction does have two gauge bosons

This make them 4?they are the W and the Z, each with two charges W e+/-1 and Z e0/+1

Which chiral symmetry?breaking chiral symmetry.

- #6

ChrisVer

Gold Member

- 3,380

- 461

:s How is reality connected with charge?

Because of the complex conjugation?

Because of the complex conjugation?

- #7

- 453

- 15

:s How is reality connected with charge?

Because of the complex conjugation?

I don't understand the question...

- #8

ChrisVer

Gold Member

- 3,380

- 461

I don't understand the question...

Is it a "must" for a real field to be chargeless? For scalars that's obvious....

- #9

samalkhaiat

Science Advisor

- 1,736

- 1,045

Yes. The electric charge IS the Noether number associated with the GLOBAL [itex]U(1)[/itex] symmetry. This vanishes for REAL FIELDS.Is it a "must" for a real field to be chargeless? For scalars that's obvious....

Share: