I Electric dipole moment of the nucleus of an atom

tamir
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Why is the electric dipole moment of the nucleus of an atom equal zero?
Summary: Why is the electric dipole moment of the nucleus of an atom equal zero?

Summary: Why is the electric dipole moment of the nucleus of an atom equal zero?

I read about the hyperfine interactions that cause the altering of the energy levels of the nuclues of an atom. Under the discussion about monopole and quadrupole interactions, the term of the dipole moment interaction was determined to be zero because the nucleus has no electric dipole moment. My question is, what are the assumptions leading to this result? It seems like the only assumption that was taken into account was the nucleus being a positive charge distibution and it does not make sense to me considering the expression of the electric dipole moment. I would assume that some sort of symmetry of the nucleus need to be considered as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you asking about Schiff moments or T-violation?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Are you asking about Schiff moments or T-violation?
To my understanding it is more simple than that.
The nucleus is considered as merely a charge distribution and the electrostatic energy of the interaction between the nucleus and the electron is approximated using multipole expansion.
What I do not understand is, what are the assumptions that result with the dipole term being zero?
 
Well, one would be T-symmetry. The other would be the Schiff moment.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Well, one would be T-symmetry. The other would be the Schiff moment.
Can you refer me to literature of those subjects?
I must admit that it seems a little bit over the top, because what I read involved more basic concepts.
As I wrote at my post, I would have assumed that some sort of symmetry of the charge distribution of the nucleus leads to its electric dipole moment being zero.
 
tamir said:
Can you refer me to literature of those subjects?

Can you tell me where you have already looked?

tamir said:
I would have assumed that some sort of symmetry of the charge distribution of the nucleus leads to its electric dipole moment being zero.

And had you Googled "Schiff moment" (which I note in passing is the third time I wrote this) you would have learned about this. I can point you in the right direction, but I can't pour knowledge into your head.

A guy prays: "Dear Lord, please make me win the lottery."
The following day he begs the Lord again: "Please make it so I win the lottery, Lord!"
The next day, he again prays: "Please, please, dear Lord, make me win the lottery - you know how much I need the money."
Suddenly there is a thunderclap and a booming voice from the heavens: "Work with me here. Buy a doggone ticket!"
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Klystron and Cryo
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In her YouTube video Bell’s Theorem Experiments on Entangled Photons, Dr. Fugate shows how polarization-entangled photons violate Bell’s inequality. In this Insight, I will use quantum information theory to explain why such entangled photon-polarization qubits violate the version of Bell’s inequality due to John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt known as the...
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I asked a question related to a table levitating but I am going to try to be specific about my question after one of the forum mentors stated I should make my question more specific (although I'm still not sure why one couldn't have asked if a table levitating is possible according to physics). Specifically, I am interested in knowing how much justification we have for an extreme low probability thermal fluctuation that results in a "miraculous" event compared to, say, a dice roll. Does a...
Back
Top