Electric Field 2: Calculate Electric Flux Through Cube Corner

AI Thread Summary
A point charge +Q is placed at a corner of a cube, and the discussion focuses on calculating the electric flux through one face of the cube. By applying Gauss's Law, it is determined that the total electric flux through the cube is Q/ε₀, which is divided among eight surrounding cubes due to symmetry. Each cube contributes 1/8 of the total flux, and since only three faces of the cube are external, the flux through one face is Q/(8*3ε₀). The final answer for the electric flux through face ABCD is Q/24ε₀. Understanding the derivation is emphasized as being more valuable than just obtaining the correct answer.
leena19
Messages
184
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge +Q is placed at one of the corners of a cube as shown in the figure.The electric flux through the surface ABCD of the cube due to the charge is
(1) Q (or Q/\epsilon_{0})
(2) Q/4 (or Q/4\epsilon_{0})
(3) Q/6 (or Q/6\epsilon_{0})
(4) Q/24 (or Q/24\epsilon_{0})
(5) Q/36 (or Q/36\epsilon_{0})

Homework Equations



Electric field intensity E=(1/4\pi\epsilon_{0})Q/x2

The Attempt at a Solution



I really don't know how to do this.I only know the above equation,but I don't know how to apply it here.
I think a -Q charge would be induced at A,a +Q charge at B,a - Q charge at C and a +Q charge at D,but where do I go from here?

Thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
I can't see the picture, but if the charge is right at the corner, then the total flux of the E-Field will be cut into what ... 8 equal pieces? (Think of stacking 8 cubes with the point charge at the common vertex.)

Now since from Gauss Law you know the total charge of an enclosed surface is Q/εo, then you know that since the cubes are all the same, that 1/8 of the entire field is passing through each cube.

But think about it for a moment and you will see that each cube has 3 external faces (faces opposite the vertex with the charge) and since each face is identical then the flux through anyone of them is ...
 
I don't know.
Now since from Gauss Law you know the total charge of an enclosed surface is Q/εo
Could you please tell me how you derived this?
I know that,according to Gauss' theorem, the total normal electric flux intersecting a closed surface,of any shape,enclosing a charge Q=Q,
i.e,
A\epsilon_{0}E = Q
A is the area enclosed by a charge Q placed at the centre.

if the charge is right at the corner, then the total flux of the E-Field will be cut into what ... 8 equal pieces? (Think of stacking 8 cubes with the point charge at the common vertex.)
I don't undrestand this part,how does the total electric flux divide into 8?

This is the picture,
http://img12.imageshack.us/img12/2296/chargen.png

THANK YOU.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
leena19 said:
I don't undrestand this part,how does the total electric flux divide into 8?

Imagine 7 other identical cubes arranged all together in a 2 X 2 X 2.

The center vertex will have the charge. (The central vertex is the only spot that all 8 cubes would have in common.) This is where the charge is on your one cube. At a corner.

Since by Gauss Law you know that all the flux through the surface of the 2x2x2 arrangement is Q/εo, then the total of the flux escaping the outward faces of the one cube must be 1/8th of the total.

But they want the flux through just 1 face. A cube has 6 faces. But in the 2x2x2 arrangement you should satisfy yourself that only 3 of the faces are on the outside. Hence the flux through anyone face must be 1/3 of what passes out of that cube.

Here's a link for Gauss Law:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/gaulaw.html#c1
 
Thank you so much for the detailed explanation.
so the the electric flux through the face ABCD,would be,
[1/(8*3)] Q/\epsilon_{0},which would be answer no. (4).
 
leena19 said:
Thank you so much for the detailed explanation.
so the the electric flux through the face ABCD,would be,
[1/(8*3)] Q/\epsilon_{0},which would be answer no. (4).

Yes. That looks like the answer.

But the understanding is worth much more than just the right answer.

Good Luck.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top