Electric Field Above a Small Hole in a Charged Spherical Shell?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the electric field above and below a small hole in a charged spherical shell. It is established that the electric field below the hole is zero due to Gauss' law, as the charge enclosed remains unchanged. For the electric field above the hole, a suggestion is made to model the electric potential first, as it simplifies the problem. Alternatively, a complex calculus approach involving surface charge integration is mentioned, though it is noted to be quite challenging. The conversation emphasizes that using electric potential can facilitate a clearer understanding of the hole's impact on the electric field.
mahorka
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey. I am trying to solve the following problem:

Given a spherical shell with radius a and charge density sigma. If a very small patch of this surface were removed, leaving a small hole, what is the electric field just above and just below this hole?

For the electric field below the hole, I think the answer is zero, by gauss' law. Since the charge enclosed would be zero (same as if the hole were not present).

However, I'm not sure how I would go about solving for the electric field above the hole. I initially thought that I could simply calculate what the field would be if the hole was not there, and then take this result and subtract the electric field of a small disk of radius a (that would represent the hole) but I don't seem to get the right answer.

And help would be appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello mahorka,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Have you studied electric potential yet? This problem will be a lot easier if you start by modeling the potential (the potential can be shown to be more or less unchanged whether the small hole is there or not). Then use its gradient to obtain the electric field.

If you don't have the luxury of using potentials, the only way I can think of doing this involves some pretty nasty calculus integrating over the surface charge, treating the surface charges as infinitely small point charges. The thing that makes this tough is you don't get to use the normal equations since spherical symmetry is lost, and the point of interest is not at the origin, but instead somewhere near the surface of the shell. This way of solving the problem is possible, yet brutal.

[Edit]: Btw, I suspect the problem might simply be asking for a verbal explanation rather than an explicit proof. Using the concept of electric potential may allow you to verbally explain what impact the hole would have, if any (without having to show the math). Or you could show the math. But potentials will make it easier either way.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top