Electric field and electric potential problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an AP Physics problem regarding the behavior of an electron in an electric potential field. It clarifies that the electron experiences a force away from the origin due to its negative charge, despite the potential slope indicating different behaviors at various points. The confusion arises from interpreting the electric field's direction based on the potential's slope, with emphasis on understanding that the force remains directed away from the origin across the entire graph. Additionally, it confirms that AP Physics primarily utilizes single-variable calculus, simplifying more complex integrals through symmetry. This insight helps clarify the relationship between electric potential, electric field, and the behavior of charged particles.
ZARATHUSTRA
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
The question is from AP Physics C Barron's

Consider the potential-position function shown below(I put it on the attached files)( the potential asymptotically approaches zero as x goes to + infinity or -infinity). The upper limit of the speed that an electron can have as it passes the origin and still remain bound close to the origin is

A. V=√2q(Vmax)/m
B. V=0
C. V=√-2q(Vmax)/m
D. V=2q(Vmax)/m
E. none of the above and here is the answer-----------------Because the charge is negative(electron), the force points away from the origin( rather than toward the origin, as for a positive charge). Therefore. the electron never remains bound close to the origin, but rather always experiences a force away from the origin.



So my confusion is why it says"the force points away from the origin" here, i think according to the formula E= - dV/dx, the B point and D point might the electron been pushed away, but at point C and E, it would be the opposite, since the slope at those two points is positive, the field would be negative, so for electron, wouldn't the force be points toward the origin at point C and E?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    20.7 KB · Views: 480
Physics news on Phys.org
and by the way, although i found out that there are a lot surface integrals or line integrals in electromagne part, but i think in AP Physics level, it's still using single variable calculus instead of multi-v calculus. Am i right?
 
You're right about the force being away from the origin from points B and D, but it's also away from the origin for the right half of the graph as well. Think about it -- the slope is opposite, yes, but it's also on the other side of the origin. Try working out the sign of the electric field and then the sign of the resulting force on an electron.

And yes, in AP Physics all the calculus is in one variable. Technically you're doing line and surface integrals, as well as double and triple integrals, but the course uses symmetry to reduce these multivariable problems down to one variable.
 
Thank you very much for your help, i really appreciate it:w
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top