Electric Field and Force of a Charged Particle Near a Stationary Ring

AI Thread Summary
A stationary ring with a uniform positive charge Q creates an electric field along its axis, which is proportional to the displacement x when x is much smaller than the radius a. The force on a negatively charged particle -q located at the center of the ring is derived from the electric field, but it is noted that at x=0, the electric field is zero due to symmetry. For small displacements in the +x direction, the particle will exhibit simple harmonic motion (SHM), with the acceleration related to the displacement. The discussion emphasizes the need to consider the mass of the particle and correct any missing terms in the equations. Overall, the analysis focuses on the behavior of a charged particle in the electric field of a charged ring.
bodensee9
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Hello:

I have the following. A stationary ring of radius a lies in the yz plane and has a uniform positive charge Q. A small particle that has mass m and a negative charge -q is located at the center of the ring. (a) show that is x << a the electric field along the axis of the ring is porportional to x. (b) find the force on teh particle as a function of x. (c) show that if the particle is given a small displacement in the +x direction, it will perform SHM.

So for (a), do I do, since the E for a ring is k*Q*x/(a^2+x^2)^(3/2), where x is the displacement on the z axis, and a is the radius. So that's a because if x is very small then the equation is basically k*Q*x/a^3. So this is porportional to x.

(b) Then wouldn't the force just be q*E, and since there's a negative charge -q here, wouldn't the F = q*k*Q*x/a^3?

(c) So to show SHM, I need to show that acceleration = some constant w^2*displacement. So couldn't I just set q*k*Q/a^3 as w?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer for (a) is correct provided you got the expression for E correct (I didn't check it). (b) is odd since x=0 and it is evident by symmetry that that E-field at the centre of the ring where the particle is located is clearly 0. Unless they mean (if the particle was instead placed at some x=b), then you would have to perform the integration to get the value.

(c) is nearly correct. Just note you have to take the mass of particle into consideration. Be careful of the missing square.
 
THanks!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top