Electric Field and Uniformly Charged Planes (conceptual)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field between two plates of a capacitor with unequal charges. The formula for the electric field due to uniformly charged planes is presented as E = σ/(2ε). It is questioned whether the electric field remains uniform when the plates have different charges. The response suggests using the superposition principle to find the net electric field, combining the contributions from both plates. The final expression for the electric field is derived, indicating that it can be calculated by adding the effects of each plate's charge.
dimpledur
Messages
193
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am pursuing conceptual help regarding electric field due to uniformly charged planes.


Homework Equations


E=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon}

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand that a capictor has plates that are +/-Q. However, how would you calculate the elctric field between the plates if the plates are not equal in charge? Would the electric field between the plates still be uniform?

E=\frac{\sigma _1}{2\epsilon} + \frac{\sigma _2}{2\epsilon}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a simple way to find that out!
Consider an arbitrary charge distribution on the two plates, of the capacitor. Find out the expression for the net electric field, at any point on the interior of a plate. What should it be equal to?
 
The force on a test charge q, due to plate Q1, would be:

F= (kqQ1)/r^2

F=[kq(sigma1)A]/r^2

therefore, E=[kq(sigma)A]/(r^2*q) =[k(sigma1)A]/r^2

If there was an addition plate with charge Q2, we would have E=[k(sigma1)A]/r^2

Therefore, the electric field due to the two plates would be:
E=[k(sigma1)A]/r^2 + [k(sigma1)A]/r^2
 
Does that look correct?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top