Electric field at a point due to a subdivided object

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field at a specific point due to a uniformly charged strip of tape. The tape is divided into three sections to approximate each as a point charge. The user attempts to calculate the electric field from the second section but realizes their vector R calculation is incorrect. They provide their initial calculations and seek clarification on the error. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly determining the vector R for accurate electric field calculations.
Kibbel
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/403/haiss.jpg/
picture

A strip of invisible tape 0.12 m long by 0.014 m wide is charged uniformly with a total net charge of 3 nC (nano = 1e-9) and is suspended horizontally, so it lies along the x axis, with its center at the origin, as shown in the diagram.
Calculate the approximate electric field at location < 0, 0.03, 0 > m (location A) due to the strip of tape. Do this by dividing the strip into three equal sections, as shown in the diagram, and approximating each section as a point charge.
What is the approximate electric field at A due to piece #2?




Homework Equations



9e9*Charge*Vector Hat/(Vector Magnitude)^2

The Attempt at a Solution



okay so for tape #3 the Vector R is <0, 0.03, 0 > - <0.06, 0, 0> = <-.06, .03, 0>
That means magnitude is 0.0671
and that means Vector R Hat is <-.8942, .4471, 0>

plug this into 9e9*1e-9*<-0.8942, .4471, 0>/(0.0671)^2

and I get <1787.44, 893721, 0>

Which is wrong... why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
before anyone wastes their time, my R vector was wrong
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top