Electric field at a point problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at a specific point due to three charges: A (-5.00 nC), B (10.0 nC), and C (5.00 nC). The user attempted to find the electric field components using the formula E = kq/r^2 but made errors in calculating the net electric field by incorrectly subtracting contributions from different charges. Feedback suggests using a symbolic approach before plugging in numbers to simplify the process and enhance clarity. Additionally, it highlights the importance of correctly summing vector components rather than subtracting them. The user seeks clarification on the correct method to calculate the electric field components.
shadowdn
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the figure above, charge A is -5.00 nC, charge B is 10.0 nC, and charge C is 5.00 nC. If x = 2.10 cm and y = 4.20 cm, what is the electric field at the dot?
b6fef5347d1c4a67a10ca69b1fc87b17_A.jpg


Homework Equations


E = kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


r = distance from A to point = sqrt(x^2+y^2)
Ea = kq/r^2 = -20'414.6 N/C
Ec = kq/x^2 = 102'040.8 N/C
Eb = kq/y^2 = 51'020.4 N/C
Eax = -20'414.6cos63.4 = -9'140.8 N/C
Eay = -20'414.6sin63.4 = -18'253.8 N/C
Enetx = Eax-Ec = -111'181.6 N/C
Enety = Eay-Eb = -69'274.2 N/C
Enet = sqrt[(-111'181.6)^2 + (-69'274.2)^2]
theta = tan^-1(Enety/Enetx) = 32 degrees

Final Answer (which was wrong): 1.13x10^5 @ 32 clockwise from horizontal

Can anyone tell me where I went wrong? Supposedly there is a special formula that I am supposed to use to find the components but I have never seen/used it before.
 

Attachments

  • problem_2_2_2_a.jpg
    problem_2_2_2_a.jpg
    3.6 KB · Views: 289
  • b6fef5347d1c4a67a10ca69b1fc87b17_A.jpg
    b6fef5347d1c4a67a10ca69b1fc87b17_A.jpg
    7.4 KB · Views: 517
Physics news on Phys.org
shadowdn said:
Enetx = Eax-Ec
You calculated the individual contributions all on the basis of right and down are positive. So why are you performing a subtraction to find their sum?

Also, please get into the habit of working purely symbolically, not plugging in numbers until the end. It has many advantages, including making your work much easier to follow and verify.
 
  • Like
Likes BeyondBelief96
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top