Electric Field at Points p3 & p4: Explained

AI Thread Summary
The electric field at point p3 is zero because it is located inside a conducting surface, where electric charges reside on the outer surface. In contrast, the electric field at point p4 is not definitively zero; it is influenced by the distribution of positive and negative charges nearby. The field strength exists only outside the conductor, as charges repel each other and align on the surface. This behavior is similar to how charges behave in a capacitor, where opposite charges attract and concentrate at the boundaries. Understanding these principles clarifies the electric field behavior in conductive materials.
rgujju
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
What will be the electric field at the points p3 and p4 in the attached image.

I think at p3 it will be zero as it is inside the conducting surface
But what about p4??
Will it be zero too? Due to negative and positive charges or will it be sigma/E(sub)o(/sub).. And why?
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1375775117.593771.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well as I believe p3 is inside a conductor which looks more like a capacitor well anyway the field strength is above zero only outside of a conducting or charged surface because that's where all the particles with similar charges are located...

But maybe you just had to do a better forums search...

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=109422
 
Crazymechanic said:
Well as I believe p3 is inside a conductor which looks more like a capacitor well anyway the field strength is above zero only outside of a conducting or charged surface because that's where all the particles with similar charges are located...

But maybe you just had to do a better forums search...

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=109422

I do not understand..
 
Okay let me go like this , there are electrons (one out of the list of fundamental elementary particles)
Electrons have charge , which is negative , now as you have probably heard charges with the same polarity tend to repel from one another.
Now a conductor or any metal into which current flows or which is just set at a given potential even without current flow has these electrons aligned so that they go and reside themselves on the outer part of that metal or wire or plate as in a capacitor.

That's why the field has a value only outside of the conductor and at the surface of it because that's where " all the fun is" or all the charge.

as in your case it looks like a capacitor as there are two separate but close conductors with opposite charges on them and opposite charges tend to get together so there is no other way but for them to be located nearest one another which happens to be the boundary of the conductor because that's where they are located.
It's like with prisoners or inmates whenever there is something interesting going on they stick to the doors and bars and watch , now they would like to go further but they can't because they are restricted.
 
Thank you very much..
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top