Electric field at the center of an arc

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at the center of an arc with a uniformly distributed charge Q. The initial equation proposed, E = KQ/R^2 cos theta, is questioned for its accuracy, prompting further exploration of the electric field's behavior at specific angles. Participants suggest evaluating the electric field at extreme angles (0 and 360 degrees) to gain insights into the graph's shape, while also discussing the need for integral calculus to accurately derive the electric field expression. The final derived expression for the electric field is E = 2kQ/πR^2, indicating a dependence on the charge and radius of the arc. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the integration process in deriving the electric field for varying angles.
tag16
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charge Q is arranged evenly on a wire bent into an arc or radius R as shown in the
Figure. What is the electric field at the center of the arc as a function of the opening
angle theta? Sketch a graph of the electric field as a function of theta for 0<theta<180 degrees.


Homework Equations



E= KQ/R^2 cos theta

The Attempt at a Solution



Is the above equation correct? If not, I'm not really sure what to do, also I'm not sure how the graph should look.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
where is the figure?
 
Where'd you get that equation?

Also, if you're worried about how the graph should look, start by figuring it out for some easy points. What's the E field going to be at the center if theta is zero (so all the charge is concentrated in a single point)? How bout if Theta is 360 degrees (so a full circle)? It's a bit harder to figure out for 180 degrees, or 90 or 270 degrees, but you should be able to make a very rough estimate. That will give you some insight into the shape of the graph.
 
sorry this is the best I can do: http://i848.photobucket.com/albums/ab41/tag16/problem1.jpg?t=1259862072

The equation I found in my physics book except the cos theta part, I was just guessing there. Though it would probably be integral cos theta or sin theta, if it's suppose to be in there at all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
\lambda=Q/\piR

dE= kdQ/R^2
dE= (kdQ/R^2) cos\theta

dQ=\lambdadl
dl= Rd\theta
dQ=\lambdaRd\theta

dE=(k[\lambdaRd\theta]/R^2)cos\theta


E=\int(k\lambdaRcos\theta/R^2)d\theta(from \pi/2 to -\pi/2)
E=k\lambda/R\int cos\thetad\theta
E=k\lambda/R\intsin\theta
E=k\lambda/R[sin(\pi/2)-sin(-\pi/2)]
E=k\lambda/2R
E=k(Q/\piR)/2R=2kQ/\piR^2
E= 2kq/\piR^2

Is this right?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top