Electric Field between two opposite, gaussian distributed charged spheres

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the electric field between two overlapping spheres with Gaussian charge distributions is complex due to the inability to simplify the expressions as with uniform charge distributions. The initial approach involves integrating the charge densities of both distributions to find the electric field at a specific point. The challenge arises from the overlapping regions, where the vectors from each charge center complicate the calculations. Seeking reference materials or examples from textbooks or articles could provide further insights into tackling this problem. Understanding the total charge density and performing integration over the entire space is essential for accurate modeling.
Nick White
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I understand how to get the electric field between two spheres of uniform charge,
<br /> \vec{E} = \frac{\rho \vec{d}}{3 \epsilon_0}<br />
which is simplified because at a point \vec{r}, the vectors from each charge center combine to give the distance, \vec{d}, between centers (since \rho's can be factored).

So far, calculating this for two overlapping spheres of gaussian charge distribution seems non-trivial since you can't make this factorization and simply obtain an expression proportional to \vec{d}...

Am I correct with the complexity of this problem, or is there some way more efficient to approach this problem?

I hope to use this electric field to model a harmonic oscillator (electron sphere oscillating around stationary ion sphere) and find a frequency...

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have first to calculate which is the total rho of you 3D distribution.

This seems to be the sum of the two rho's you presented. After that I guess you will have to use integration over the whole space to get the field at point P = (x,y,z).

Best Regards,

DaTario
 
DaTario said:
I think you have first to calculate which is the total rho of you 3D distribution.

This seems to be the sum of the two rho's you presented. After that I guess you will have to use integration over the whole space to get the field at point P = (x,y,z).

Best Regards,

DaTario

Thanks for the response DaTario.

I've started with that method - finding the field at a point P = (x,y,z) (point \vex{r} in spherical) by integrating the charge from the positive distribution \rho_{+}=\rho_{0}exp(-(r^{2})/(2\sigma^{2})) and then the negative distribution \rho_{-}=\rho_{0}exp(-(r-d)^{2}/(2\sigma^{2})), assuming d is the displacement of the negative charge center along the z-axis for convenience, but i think it get hairy because these end up being factors for the vectors \vec{r}_{+} and \vec{r}_{-} when you sum the electric fields to get the total, in the overlap.<br /> <br /> I was wondering if there&#039;s maybe a book problem like this, or even an article i could refer to...<br /> <br /> NW
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top