Electric Field Calculation for Three Charges on a Horizontal Line

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field at a point halfway between a -3.0 C charge and a 2.0 C charge, with a 1.0 C charge further right. The initial calculation yields an electric field of 3.2*10^6 N/C, but the answer key states it should be -1.8*10^7 N/C. The discrepancy arises from not accounting for the direction of the electric field produced by the negative charge, which should be considered negative. A hint suggests evaluating the movement of a positive test charge influenced by the three charges to clarify the directionality of the electric fields. Understanding these directional influences is crucial for accurate electric field calculations.
jaejoon89
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
"Three charges are placed at 100-m intervals along a horizontal line: a charge of –3.0 C
on the left, 2.0 C in the middle, and 1.0 C on the right. What is the electric field E on
the horizontal line halfway between the –3.0 C and 2.0 C charges?"



When I do the calculation E = E1 - E2 - E3 with E1 the electric field produced on the point from the -3.0 C charge, I get 3.2*10^6 N/C:

E = k[(3.0 C / (50 m)^2) - (2.0 C / (50 m)^2) - (1.0 C / (150 m)^2)] = 3.2*10^6 N/C.

However, the answer key says it is -1.8*10^7 N/C. How do you get this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jaejoon89 said:
E = k[(3.0 C / (50 m)^2) - (2.0 C / (50 m)^2) - (1.0 C / (150 m)^2)] = 3.2*10^6 N/C
This term should have a minus sign due to the value of the -3C charge.
 
jaejoon89 said:
"Three charges are placed at 100-m intervals along a horizontal line: a charge of –3.0 C
on the left, 2.0 C in the middle, and 1.0 C on the right. What is the electric field E on
the horizontal line halfway between the –3.0 C and 2.0 C charges?"

When I do the calculation E = E1 - E2 - E3 with E1 the electric field produced on the point from the -3.0 C charge, I get 3.2*10^6 N/C:

E = k[(3.0 C / (50 m)^2) - (2.0 C / (50 m)^2) - (1.0 C / (150 m)^2)] = 3.2*10^6 N/C.

Hi jaejoon89! :smile:

Hint: if a test charge is positive, say, will each of the three charges move it to the left or the right? :wink:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top