Electric Field Calculations: Speed and Zero Points | Help Needed

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two main questions regarding electric field calculations. The first question involves determining the speed of a particle moving parallel to an electric field, where the user struggles with integrating the electric field and equating it to kinetic energy, resulting in incorrect velocity calculations. The second question addresses finding points where the electric field is zero between a positive and a negative charge, with the user encountering issues when applying the quadratic formula and understanding the resulting equations. Participants suggest clarifying the integration bounds and confirm that the equations should simplify correctly. The user expresses a need for assistance in resolving these calculations.
cnugrl
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure if this has been asked, but i am in major need of help. i have 2 questions. first is determining the speed of a particle when the speed is parallel to the electric field. i talked to my prof. and he suggested finding the energy, U, and by integrating E with respect to z, by doing so, that left me with E*z from Zinitial (1-cos(theta)*L) to Zfinal(0). after doing this, i st this equal to 1/2 mv^2. to solve for the velocity, however, i am not getting the correct answer. :mad: and I'm getting frustrated. does anyone know where i am going wrong?

my second question is finding finite value(s) where an electric field is zero. by having a +q charge at the orgin and a -2q charge at x=5.8m. my professor told me to use kq/r^2 and where q is and q or -2q and r is x and x-d respectively where d is 5.8 m. i solving and put the equation = 0, and used the quadratic formula to get the answer. However, i am not getting this correct, when i solve for x i get x^2+2xd-d^2. i have used various other ways of trying to get this answer correct, by changing the signs and and i am still getting incorrect answers. I need to do the same with electric potential, but i do not understand how i can get 2 answers from a linear equation. i am getting d-3x where d =5.8 m. :confused:
if anyone could help, i would appreciate it so much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cnugrl said:
I'm not sure if this has been asked, but i am in major need of help. i have 2 questions. first is determining the speed of a particle when the speed is parallel to the electric field. i talked to my prof. and he suggested finding the energy, U, and by integrating E with respect to z, by doing so, that left me with E*z from Zinitial (1-cos(theta)*L) to Zfinal(0). after doing this, i st this equal to 1/2 mv^2. to solve for the velocity, however, i am not getting the correct answer. :mad: and I'm getting frustrated. does anyone know where i am going wrong?


Who's "Z"...?

The equation is:
m\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}=q\vec{E}

If the acceleration has the sense with the velocity (the sense of the acc.is the same with the one of the electric field for a positively cherged particle),then project the previous relation on an axis and integrate wrt to corresponding limits...

cnugrl said:
my second question is finding finite value(s) where an electric field is zero. by having a +q charge at the orgin and a -2q charge at x=5.8m. my professor told me to use kq/r^2 and where q is and q or -2q and r is x and x-d respectively where d is 5.8 m. i solving and put the equation = 0, and used the quadratic formula to get the answer. However, i am not getting this correct, when i solve for x i get x^2+2xd-d^2. i have used various other ways of trying to get this answer correct, by changing the signs and and i am still getting incorrect answers. I need to do the same with electric potential, but i do not understand how i can get 2 answers from a linear equation. i am getting d-3x where d =5.8 m. :confused:
if anyone could help, i would appreciate it so much

No,on normal basis it should reduce to a quadratic...

Daniel.
 
Z is the limit bounds...initial to final. plus, i was using it as a variable to integrate on
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top