Electric Field Due to Point Charges?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a homework problem involving three point charges arranged as an electric quadrupole. The key tasks include finding the electric field's magnitude and direction along the positive x-axis and using the binomial expansion for approximation when x is much larger than a. Participants suggest that the y-components of the electric fields from the charges at y=a and y=-a will cancel out, leaving only the x-components to consider. A clarification is provided that the resulting power will be 3/2, allowing for the use of the binomial approximation when x is significantly greater than a. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately calculating the x-components to derive the electric field.
ylem
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Hello!

Just hoping for a bit of help on a homework problem I'm doing at the moment...

Basically this is the question:

Three point charges are placed along the y axis: a charge q at y=a, a charge -2q at the origin and a charge q at q=-a. Such an arrangement is called an electric quadrupole.
a. Find the magnitude and direction of the electric quadrupole at points along the positive x-axis.
b. Use the binomial expansion to find an approximate expression for the electric field valid for x>>a. Contrast this behaviour to that of the electric field of a dipole.


I've tried to do this loads of different ways...

I've basically used E = 1/4pi...q/r^2 (didn't know how do get a symbol for the permittivity of free space!) and then for the vector have put (xi - aj) for q at a and so on... But then when I add them up to come up with a total E I just get something that looks really messy - although it is to the power of a half and could be expanded using the binomial, it just looks wrong...

Any input on how I could try to solve the question would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks, Sam(antha)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ylem said:
Hello!
Just hoping for a bit of help on a homework problem I'm doing at the moment...
Basically this is the question:
Three point charges are placed along the y axis: a charge q at y=a, a charge -2q at the origin and a charge q at q=-a. Such an arrangement is called an electric quadrupole.
a. Find the magnitude and direction of the electric quadrupole at points along the positive x-axis.
b. Use the binomial expansion to find an approximate expression for the electric field valid for x>>a. Contrast this behaviour to that of the electric field of a dipole.

I've tried to do this loads of different ways...
I've basically used E = 1/4pi...q/r^2 (didn't know how do get a symbol for the permittivity of free space!) and then for the vector have put (xi - aj) for q at a and so on... But then when I add them up to come up with a total E I just get something that looks really messy - although it is to the power of a half and could be expanded using the binomial, it just looks wrong...
Any input on how I could try to solve the question would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks, Sam(antha)

What you did seems to be right. Just find the vector sum of the Electric field due to the three charges. The y-component of the field due to the charge at y=a and y=-a should cancel. So along the x-axis, your net Field should also point along the x direction.
If you post and show exactly where you are having difficulties (ie, which equations) it will be easier to help.
 
Last edited:
Thanks!

This is where I'm getting confused though, because if the y components cancel then when I find the magnitude of the field I will just be squaring the x components, so I won't have anything to the power of a half to expand using the Binomial? :confused:
 
You will have a power of 3/2. When you take the x-component due to the 2 charges at y=a and y=-a, the field will be
\frac{q \cos\theta }{4 \pi \epsilon (a^2 + x^2)}
So find \cos \theta and substiute to find the Field.
So you will be able to use your approximation when x>>a
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top