Electric field in a cylindrical configuration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving the electric field around a cylindrical wire and applying Gauss's Law. The electric field outside the wire is directed towards it, indicating that the wire is negatively charged. Participants suggest using a cylindrical Gaussian surface to derive the charge per unit length on the wire, which is calculated to be approximately -1.67 x 10^-9 C/m. For the electric field at a radius of 3.0 mm, participants discuss using relevant formulas but emphasize the importance of understanding Gauss's Law rather than just plugging in numbers. The conversation highlights the need for a conceptual grasp of the principles involved in the problem.
nugget
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Immediately outside a very long, cylindrical wire of radius R1=0.6mm, the electric field is 50 kV/m directed towards the wire's surface. The wire is in air.

What is the charge per unit along length the wire? (take care with sign)

What is the field at R2=3.0mm? (i.e. 2.4mm from the wire's surface)

A hollow cylindrical metal tube with inner radius 3.0mm is now placed around the wire, to form a coaxial cable, what will be the charge per unit length on the inner surface of this tube? Explain.

Homework Equations



Really not too sure,

The Attempt at a Solution



even just a headstart would be much appreciated if anybody knows how to solve these.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you tell if the charge on the wire is positive or negative? Why do you think so?

Consider using Gauss's Law for this problem. There might even be an example in your textbook treating something similar that you can use to pattern your solution after. Look for a cylindrical gaussian surface.
 
I think the charge on the cylinder/wire is negative, as all the electric field is directed toward it's surface. If it was +vely charged then the electric field would be directed away from the wire, as the field represents the movement of +ve charges.

From here I am still confused, except for knowing that the charge per unit length on the wire will be negative. How do i use Gauss? how do i tackle the other parts of the question?

For part (b), what is the field at R2 = 3.0mm, can I use the formula for field due to a point charge and just use any point along the cylinder?
 
You got the sign of the charge right. Now for Part (a)

Imagine a Gaussian surface of radius that is a cylinder of length L (the length doesn't really matter in the end) and radius 0.6 mm, i.e. it essentially looks like a piece of the wire. Note that the electric field is constant on the surface and points towards the axis.

To answer part (a), you need to complete the following steps. Once you understand how part (a) works, part (b) should be easy.

Find an expression for the electric flux through this Gaussian surface. (Note that there is no flux through the two flat caps of the cylinder because the field is parallel to the surface).
Assuming that charge Q is enclosed by the surface, write Gauss's Law.
The answer to part (a) is Q/L which you can get from the previous step.
 
I got -1.67x10-9 C/m for Q/L.

used a formula which was E field for an infinite line of charge, is this the right value?

and for (b) I just put the values in another formula to see what sort of answer i got - field at 3.0mm = 1.7x106 C/m.

how am i doing?
 
You are doing OK if getting a number for an answer is what you are after. However, if the problem is, as I suspect, about Gauss's Law, plugging number in this formula will not help you understand Gauss's Law and how to use it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top