Electric Field in and outside a cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field (E) inside and outside an infinitely long cylinder with charge density lambda and radius R. For r < R, the electric field is determined using Gauss' law, where the flux equals the enclosed charge divided by epsilon. For r > R, the electric field can be expressed using the formula E = (lambda) / (2 pi epsilon not * r). Participants emphasize the importance of applying Gauss' law correctly and encourage sharing specific confusion or previous attempts at solving the problem. The conversation highlights the need for a clear understanding of electric field concepts in relation to cylindrical charge distributions.
reising1
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
An infinitely long cylinder has charge density lamda and has a radius R.

What is E when r < R and when r > R.

I know the formula for an infinite line of charge is
E = (lamda) / (2 pi epsilon not * r)

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
reising1 said:
An infinitely long cylinder has charge density lamda and has a radius R.

What is E when r < R and when r > R.

I know the formula for an infinite line of charge is
E = (lamda) / (2 pi epsilon not * r)

Thanks!

do you know Gauss' law?
 
Yes. Flux = q enclosed / Epislon
 
reising1 said:
Yes. Flux = q enclosed / Epislon

Hah. Well, have you tried to apply Gauss' law to this problem? The forum rules forbid posters from doing your homework for you. Instead, we are here to guide you. You won't get any help without posting the source of your confusion or posting work.

"here is the problem, thanks" is not acceptable
 
Okay well I know that the integral of E dotted with dA is the flux, which can be simplifed to EA due to the symmetry of the problem. And the area would be equivlant to the pi r squared times length. And q enclosed would be lamda times L.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top