Electric Field/ infinite charged sheet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the electric field produced by three charged sheets with different charge densities. The electric field due to an infinite sheet is given by the formula E = σ/2ε, where σ is the charge density. The user is confused about why the electric field vectors from sheet 2, which has a negative charge density, are twice the magnitude of those from sheets 1 and 3, which have positive charge densities. Clarification is provided that the center sheet's surface charge density is -2σ0, explaining the discrepancy in magnitudes. The conversation emphasizes the consistent application of Gauss' Law and the properties of electric fields from charged sheets.
Andy13
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There are three charged sheets with various charge densities. The following link shows a diagram, and solutions (not mine; these are some professor's solutions but I don't understand them yet):

http://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/PHY212.08spring/HW/WHW-3.pdf

Draw vectors at each of the points A-D to show the direction and relative magnitude at the point due to a) sheet 1 b) sheet 2 c) sheet 3.

Homework Equations



E field due to infinite sheet = σ/2ε
(where ε = permittivity constant and σ = charge density)

Flux = ∫ EdA = E*A = |E||A|cos(θ)

Gauss' Law: Flux = q(enclosed)/εo

The Attempt at a Solution



I know which direction the vectors go, but I don't know what their magnitudes are. Surfing the internet gave me this (scroll to last page):

http://www.phy.syr.edu/courses/PHY212.08spring/HW/WHW-3.pdf

I know that the magnitudes of each vector of the electric field from each individual sheet from points A-D should be equal, because the electric field from a charged sheet doesn't depend on radius (for example, sheet 1's field could give vectors of magnitude |a| at every point).

However, I don't understand why sheet 2 (σ = -1), according to the above solutions, has vectors of twice the magnitude of sheets 1 and 3 (σ= +1). What am I missing?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with you.

His solution is consistent with the center sheet having a surface charge density of -2σ0 .

(I have taught this subject for more than 20 years.)
 
SammyS said:
I agree with you.

His solution is consistent with the center sheet having a surface charge density of -2σ0 .

(I have taught this subject for more than 20 years.)

Thanks SammyS-- I'm glad I wasn't misunderstanding something.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top