Electric field inside concentric solenoids

AI Thread Summary
Dr. Y is attempting to create an electric field on the circumferences of two concentric circles using a superconducting solenoid powered by a versatile current supply. Dr. X argues that it is impossible to generate an electric field with this setup. The discussion revolves around whether Dr. Y can indeed produce an electric field and how to calculate it if possible. There is uncertainty about the configuration due to the lack of a visible figure, which hinders further analysis. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in the setup to determine the feasibility of generating the electric field.
mikeyBoy83

Homework Statement


Dr. X has an infinitely long superconducting solenoid with n turns per unit length and a power supply to drive arbitrary current wave forms through the solenoid's winding. The power supply can drive DC currents, temporarily ramped currents, sine wave currents, etc...; whatever Dr. X programs it to do. Dr. Y wants to accelerate some electrons on the circumference with radii a and b as shown in the figure. Dr. X says that Dr. Y is nuts; you cannot create an electric field with the superconducting solenoid and the power supply.

Can Dr. Y produce an electric field on the two circumferences? If Dr. Y cannot produce an electric field, prove it. If Dr. Y can produce an electric field explain how and calculate the electric field on the circumferences with radii a and b shown in the figure.

Homework Equations

/information[/B]
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B818Uj3Z5tjAQUtJTjA4V1R5RXVkaWN0VFFfMldFTF95OWZZ (Sorry, I guess my image won't load)
If such a field were possible both would be time varying due to the multiple programmable options on the power supply and so the electromagnetic 'news' would travel at the speed of light.

The Attempt at a Solution


I can find the electric field without problem. What I am unsure of is whether or not it is even possible with this configuration.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mikeyBoy83 said:
What I am unsure of is whether or not it is even possible with this configuration.
Without a figure we cannot figure out what "this configuration" is.
 
Your URL seems to resolve to a google drive location, and may not be public accessible. A better option is to UPLOAD the image (use the UPLOAD button at the bottom right of the edit panel), or perhaps a screen capture cut&paste.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top