Electric field lines from a moving charged particle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of electric field lines from a moving charged particle, specifically a proton, and its interaction with a stationary electron. It establishes that the electric field from a charged particle propagates at the speed of light. The thought experiment presented raises questions about whether the electron would move towards the proton's past position or its future position, highlighting the complexities of electrodynamics and the implications of charge conservation. The conversation emphasizes that the scenario violates established physical laws, making predictions about such interactions problematic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrodynamics and electric fields
  • Familiarity with the principles of special relativity
  • Knowledge of charge conservation laws
  • Basic concepts of particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of charge conservation in particle physics
  • Study the propagation of electric fields in special relativity
  • Explore thought experiments in quantum mechanics and their interpretations
  • Learn about the effects of magnetic fields on charged particles
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of electromagnetism, and anyone interested in the theoretical implications of charged particle interactions in relativistic contexts.

nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,773
Reaction score
256
The electric field emanating from charged particle travels at the speed of light; fine. To pose an unrealistic thought experiment (a more realistic, if more complicated, thought experiment could replace this one, but the unrealistic one gives the idea), if a proton were to suddenly pop into existence at a certain time T in a vacuum, and a stationary electron were situated 300,000 km away (and nothing else in the vicinity), then after one second, at time T+1 (ignoring the difficulty in synchronizing watches ), the electron would start to move towards the proton (and vice-versa, of course) in a straight line between the electron and proton. So far, so classic. However, if that proton is moving, would the electron at the moment T+1
(a) start to move toward the position the proton was at time T, or
(b) with a sort of quantum-eraser retroactive effect move toward the position the proton would be at time T+1?
(ignoring the effect of any magnetic field created by the moving proton)
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The appearing proton violates the laws of electrodynamics (charge conservation). It does not make sense to ask what physical laws predict in a situation where the laws are violated.

"Where the proton was one second ago" is a better description, but it is not always exact.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nomadreid
Thanks for the reply, mfb.
mfb said:
The appearing proton violates the laws of electrodynamics (charge conservation). It does not make sense to ask what physical laws predict in a situation where the laws are violated.
This is why I inserted the caveat that one could certainly make up a Gedankenexperiment which did not violate the laws of physics but which got the idea across. My experiment was in the spirit of 3:40-5:20 of Greene's . I could have perhaps better simply asked the question without thought experiment in this way: "assuming it makes sense to talk about the velocity and straight-line path of the carriers of the electric field, then it makes sense to ask about that path as a straight line between two space-time points. Are these points separated in time as would be expected in a classical theory, or not?"
mfb said:
"Where the proton was one second ago" is a better description, but it is not always exact.
I presume that is the answer to my question, despite its impossibility. I also presume that the lack of exactitude you refer to is due to relativistic considerations, not to mention the magnetic field. Any further corrections will be appreciated.
Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K