Electric Field of a Capacitor with asymmetric dielectric

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field of a capacitor with an asymmetric dielectric. The user seeks guidance on how to approach the problem, particularly regarding the impact of boundaries and the arrangement of dielectrics. Initial responses emphasize the importance of showing work and suggest considering the capacitor's configuration as series and parallel combinations. The user proposes that placing charges on the boundary could lead to a model with three capacitors in parallel. The conversation highlights the complexity of the problem and the need for a clear understanding of electric fields in different dielectric materials.
Mikey789
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,
if an question regarding a capacitor.
As seen in the picture there is a capacitor with an asymmetric dielectric e1 and e2.

http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/5999/kondensatorti8.jpg

My question:
Who do I calculate the E-field of the capacitor?

thanks in advamce, help is appreciated!
Mike
 

Attachments

  • kondensator.jpg
    kondensator.jpg
    7 KB · Views: 486
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread moved to homework help.

You generally need to show your own work in order for us to provide tutorial assistance. This is a tricky problem, so I'll offer one initial hint -- would it change the problem at all if you put in a floating metal plate at the green/beige boundary on the left and one on the green/beige boundary on the right? Try picturing that, and think about how capacitors in series add. Please show your work...
 
berkeman said:
Thread moved to homework help.

You generally need to show your own work in order for us to provide tutorial assistance. This is a tricky problem, so I'll offer one initial hint -- would it change the problem at all if you put in a floating metal plate at the green/beige boundary on the left and one on the green/beige boundary on the right? Try picturing that, and think about how capacitors in series add. Please show your work...


Ok,
I know that the problem is in the middle...

If I just take the the left and the right part I have two capacitors in series.. which isn't a problem at all... the D-Fields are equal througout the capacitor and the E-Fields "change" at the boundary.. no problem here...

Now I take the middle part...
Depending on where I put the Gaussian surface I get inconsistent results... (see image 2)
In order to make the inconsistancy disapear I place electrons(+ or -) on the vertical part of the boundry.

->that would leave me with three capacitors in parallel

Is that correct?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • kondensator2.jpg
    kondensator2.jpg
    10 KB · Views: 474
  • kondensator3.jpg
    kondensator3.jpg
    12.3 KB · Views: 489
I would have split it in two. Why are you thinking of three?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top