Electric Field of a Spherical Conducting Shell

AI Thread Summary
A spherical conducting shell with charge +Q has an electric field outside but none inside due to Gauss' Law. Inside the shell, no charge is enclosed by a Gaussian surface, resulting in zero electric flux and thus no electric field. The symmetry of the spherical shell ensures that electric field contributions from opposite sides cancel each other out. This differs from a charged plate, where the electric field exists in both directions. The discussion emphasizes the geometrical properties of the shell that lead to this unique behavior.
johnnyies
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Not a homework question:

A spherical conducting shell of inner radius a and outer radius b carries a total charge of +Q distributed on the surface of a conducting shell.

http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-02Electricity-and-MagnetismSpring2002/VideoAndCaptions/detail/embed03.htm

If you watch prof. Lewin, he says that a uniformly distributed charge on a shell has an electric field outside the shell, but not inside. Can someone explain why so? I thought if we had a surface such as a plate, the E-field points out in both directions, but why doesn't it exist in a sphere?

sorry for no pics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The easy answer is Guass' Law. Since we cannot arrange a Gaussian surface inside the shell that encloses any charge, then there is no electric flux and we can conclude by arguments of symmetry (by choosing the proper Gaussian surfaces) that there must be no electric field inside the spherical shell.

The hard way of proving this is to calculate it out by doing the integration of Coulomb's Law. Obviously though, should you do this you realize that because the electric field has an associated direction, that the contributions from say a patch of charge to the right of your observation point will be countered by a similar patch of charge to the left of your observation point. The shell ensures that you always have a volume of charge surrounding you, so electric field contributions will cancel out. This is the primary geometrical difference in comparison with a sheet of charge.
 
Last edited:
Hi.
Let us consider simpler but essentially similar case, a spherical shell charged +Q. Inside the shell E=0. Gauss's law is the simplest way of explanation as Born2bwire said.

To supplement it, consider inward electric field caused by the opposite side of the shell. It reduces inward electric field generated at this side. And it strengthen outward electric field.

Opposite shell 0 inside ←←← Q →→→ Outside of shell

Considering charges on shell in opposite side
  
Opposite shell Q inside __ ← Q →→→→→ outside of shell

In this way all the other part of charged spherical shell cancel the part here in inward electric field generation.
Regards.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
Back
Top