Electric Field of a Uniformly Charged Disc at Large Distances

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field of a uniformly charged disc at large distances, specifically when x is much greater than the radius a. The initial equation derived for the electric field incorrectly approaches zero, which contradicts the hint that the answer should not be zero. Participants emphasize the importance of using a more accurate approximation for the square root term, suggesting the binomial approximation to refine the calculation. The correct expression for the electric field is ultimately simplified to a non-zero value, confirming the need for careful handling of approximations in such problems. The final result aligns with the expected behavior of the electric field at large distances from the charged disc.
whatisreality
Messages
286
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


What is the field of a disc radius a, uniformly charged with surface charge density σ, for x>>a?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I've worked out the equation for the field of a disc:
##E = ## ##\frac{\sigma x}{2 \epsilon}## ##\frac{\sqrt{a^2+x^2}-x}{x \sqrt{a^2+x^2}}##

I'm also given a hint, which is that the answer shouldn't be zero. As far as I can tell, if x>>a, this definitely becomes zero! I have looked up my answer for E and it is right. To work out E for x>>a, I essentially ignored all a as irrelevant - is that wrong?

##E = ## ##\frac{\sigma x}{2 \epsilon}## ##\frac{\sqrt{x^2}-x}{x \sqrt{x^2}}## is most definitely zero!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a finite value of ##x## that is much greater than ##a##, ##E## will be small but it won't be zero. You have "over approximated". In this type of problem, you want to keep the lowest order nonzero approximation.

Instead of approximating ##\sqrt{x^2+a^2}## in the numerator as ##\sqrt{x^2}##, find a more accurate approximation in terms of the small quantity ##a/x##.
Hint: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_approximation

You might find it easier to first simplify your expression for E by cancelling some ##x##'s and splitting the fraction involving the square roots into the difference of two fractions. You will then have only one square root to worry about.
 
  • Like
Likes whatisreality
Simplifying the expression gives

##E = \frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon}(1 - \frac{1}{\sqrt{\frac{a^2}{x^2}+1}})##
And then use a binomial approximation for ##\sqrt{\frac{a^2}{x^2}+1}##.
Thank you, gave the right answer :)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top