Electric Field of a Uniformly Charged Ring

ILoveCollege
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A uniformly charged ring of radius 8.1 cm has a total charge of 118 micro Coulombs. The value of the Coulomb constant is 8.98755e9 N M^2/C^2. Find the magnitude of the electric field on the axis of the ring at 1.15 cm from the center of the ring. Answer in units of N/C.

Homework Equations


F= k Qq/ r^2
E= kq/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried subtracting 1.15 cm from 8.1 cm for "r" and plugged that "r" value in the F equation but that answer is wrong. By axis , do they mean horizontally (as in along the diameter) or vertically?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The ring axis is vertical (normal to the diameter).

You should sum the fields produced by each part of the ring (it's an integral over the ring).
 
Why would I need to integrate? It already gives me the total charge for the ring. from what points would I integrate? 0 to 8.1?
 
You need to integrate only over the charged area. In cylindrical coordinates it is

<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> r = 8.1 \text{cm}; \\<br /> 0 &lt; \phi &lt; 2\pi; \\<br /> z = 0.<br /> \end{array}<br />

Since the ring is charged uniformly there is no need to calculte the integral explicitly.
Just derive the Ez component of the field produced by a point charge placed on the ring. Than multiple it by the factor determined by the linear charge density of the ring.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top