Electric Field of Concentric Cylinders: r = 4.0 and 7.1 cm

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field of two concentric cylinders with given radii and charge densities, apply Gauss's law. For r = 4.0 cm, only the inner cylinder's charge contributes since it is within the outer cylinder. For r = 7.1 cm, the electric field must account for both cylinders' charges as the Gaussian surface encloses them. The relevant equations involve linear charge density and the total charge within the Gaussian surface. Understanding the contribution of each cylinder is crucial for accurate calculations.
tbomber
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Two long, charged, concentric cylinders have radii of 3.0 and 6.0 cm. The charge per unit length is 4.8 10- 6 C/m on the inner cylinder and -8.0 10-6 C/m on the outer cylinder. Find the electric field at

(a) r = 4.0 cm and

(b) r = 7.1 cm


I know how to find the electric field for each individual cylinder AT 3 and 6 cm... using this equation:

E (electric field) = Q (total charge) / (2*pi*radius*(Q/lambda)*epsilon0)

but i haven't a clue as to how to find the electric field when you include another charged surface using gauss's law...

any help would be much appreciated - as you can see I'm pretty lost.

some equations i know that may or may not help:

Lambda (sp?... linear charge density) = Q / L where Q is the total charge of the surface and L is the length of the gaussian surface

E*A = q/e0 where e0 = 8.85E-12 and q is the charge within the gaussian surface... and A is the surface area of the cylinder (not including the two circles on either end).

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know how to find the electric field for one cylinder you can find it for both. Just include the charge from both cylinders in your Q.
 
dicerandom said:
If you know how to find the electric field for one cylinder you can find it for both. Just include the charge from both cylinders in your Q.

And remember that the charge due to the outside cylinder does not factor into the r=4 cm calculation because you are "inside of the outside" cylinder.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
And remember that the charge due to the outside cylinder does not factor into the r=4 cm calculation because you are "inside of the outside" cylinder.

-Dan
so does that mean for A and B I'm only finding the electric field for the inside and outside cylinders, respectively?
 
In part (b) your Gaussian surface encloses both the inner and outer cylinders, so you need to include the charge for both. The electric field you calculate will be the electric field due to both cylinders.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top