Electric Field of Equilateral Triangle of Point Charges

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the electric field at the midpoint of a side of an equilateral triangle formed by three identical point charges, each with a value of 2.7 x 10^-6 C. The total force acting at the midpoint is determined to be 43.22 N, resulting from the contributions of the two charges on the same side, which cancel each other out due to their identical nature. Consequently, the net electric field is solely due to the charge at the opposite vertex. The final calculated electric field intensity is approximately 16,007,407 N/C. Visual aids, such as diagrams, are recommended for clarity in understanding the forces and directions involved.
SD2014
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point charge q = 2.7 x 10^-6 C is placed at each corner of an equilateral triangle with sides of .11 m in length. What is the magnitude of the electric field at the midpoint of any of the 3 sides of the triangle.


Homework Equations


F = kqq/r^2
E = F/q



The Attempt at a Solution


F = k(2.7x10^-6)^2/.055^2
F = 21.66 N

Since there are two forces acting at this point
2 x 21.66 = 43.22 N is the total force.

E = F/q
43.22 N/2.7x10^-6C
= 16007407 N/C
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the intensity due to the 2 charges on the same side of the triangle ( where d point is taken) cancel out since the charges are of same nature ( forces act in opposite directions). so the net field is contributed only by the charge on opposite vertex.
 
I always believe that when you have a problem such this, it is better to draw a simple figure to be sure that what you are doing is right ..

so for your problem see the following figure:

http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/1414/64786042.jpg


figure (1) represents your problem, you have identical charges at the croners of the triangle..

lets consider the situation (figure (2) ) where we want to find the field at the midside (the one on the left) .. notice carefully the directions of the fields from each charge , what can you conclude?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top