Electric field outside conductor if charge placed inside it

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the electric field outside a conductor with a charge placed inside it, specifically when the charge is not centered. It is established that the charge distribution on the inner surface of the conductor will be non-uniform due to the off-center placement of the charge, while the outer surface will have a uniform charge distribution to maintain a zero electric field within the conductor itself. Gauss's Law is highlighted as a crucial tool for determining the electric field outside the conductor, indicating that the field will be influenced solely by the enclosed charge. Participants express confusion about the implications of non-uniform charge distribution on the electric field calculations. Ultimately, it is clarified that while the inner surface charge distribution is non-uniform, the outer surface charge distribution must be uniform to ensure the electric field inside the conductor remains zero.
jd12345
Messages
251
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A conductor with inner radius R and outer radius 2R. A charge q is kept at a distance d<R but it is not at the centre. What will be the electric field outside the conductor? Will the charge distribution be uniform?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i actually have some answers but I'm not sure about them
i suppose charge distribution will not be uniform as q is not at the centre(but I am not sure)
electric field outside the conductor will be only due to q right? Or will it be zero (im confused)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jd12345 said:

Homework Statement


A conductor with inner radius R and outer radius 2R. A charge q is kept at a distance d<R but it is not at the centre. What will be the electric field outside the conductor? Will the charge distribution be uniform?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


i actually have some answers but I'm not sure about them
i suppose charge distribution will not be uniform as q is not at the centre(but I am not sure)
electric field outside the conductor will be only due to q right? Or will it be zero (im confused)
I'm assuming that the conductor's outer surface is a sphere.

Use Gauss's Law to help you answer your questions.

Try to give a more detailed justification for your answers so that we may better help you.
 
jd12345 said:

Homework Statement


A conductor with inner radius R and outer radius 2R. A charge q is kept at a distance d<R but it is not at the centre. What will be the electric field outside the conductor? Will the charge distribution be uniform?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


i actually have some answers but I'm not sure about them
i suppose charge distribution will not be uniform as q is not at the centre(but I am not sure)
electric field outside the conductor will be only due to q right? Or will it be zero (im confused)
This is a good problem to think about for awhile. There might also be an example within your textbook/coursework that can help you through this. So I won't give you direct hints. But I will give the following guidance:

There are two charge distributions to consider. There is the charge distribution on the inside surface of the shell and a different distribution on the outside surface of the shell.

You might ask, "Where do these charge distributions originate from?" The answer is basically this:
  1. The static electric field within a conductor (i.e. within the conducting material itself; inside the metal itself) is always zero.
  2. If a charge is brought near a conducting object, it will induce a surface charge distribution on the surface of the conducting object to ensure that the electric field in the conducting material itself is zero. The surface charge distribution will automatically arrange itself in whatever way it takes to ensure that that the electric field in the conductor is zero.

When considering the surface charge distribution on the interior of the shell, ask yourself, "Qualitatively speaking, what characteristics does the surface charge distribution have at r = R to force E = 0 in the region R < r < 2R?

For the charge distribution on the exterior of the shell, ask yourself the same thing, but also note that the shell itself is not charged. The net charge on the shell (including both inside and out) is zero. So if there is some charge on the inside of the shell, there must be an equal and opposite amount charge on the outside of the shell.

When considering the electric field outside the conductor, consider Gauss' Law. :wink:

[Edit: I see SammyS beat me to the response.]
 
Okay i am clear about the charge distribution at the interior and exterior of the conductor
But i have a doubt about the electric field outside the conductor

Gauss law states that Electric Flux = Charge enclosed / ε
Well the net charge inside is just q but you can't take out the electric field outside the integral of the electric flux because electric field is not unifrom outisde the sphere( as charge distribution on the sphere is not uniform)
 
jd12345 said:
Gauss law states that Electric Flux = Charge enclosed / ε
Well the net charge inside is just q
Yes,that's right. :approve:
but you can't take out the electric field outside the integral of the electric flux because electric field is not unifrom outisde the sphere( as charge distribution on the sphere is not uniform)
Wait, think about this some more. Remember the electric field inside the (metal) conducting material itself is 0. What sort of charge distribution on the outside of the outer surface of the shell would be required such that the electric field is zero on the inside? :wink:
 
Okay got it(after lot of thinkng) - at the inner surface charge distribution will be non-uniform. At the outer surface charge distribution will be uniform to keep the electric field zero inside the conductor.
So you can take out the electric field outsidee the integral and figure out the electric field
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top