Electric Field question (two of them)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two problems related to calculating the electric field at the center of a square and a rectangle with point charges. For the first problem, the user initially miscalculated the electric field due to not converting units from centimeters to meters, leading to incorrect results. After correcting the unit conversion, they found the electric field to be 2448 N/C for the square configuration. In the second problem, there is confusion about the arrangement of charges, and the user attempts to apply the Pythagorean theorem to find the distance for electric field calculations. The discussion highlights the importance of unit conversion and understanding charge arrangements in electric field problems.
itsagulati
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



#1:
Four point charges have the same magnitude of 6.80 x 10^-12 C and are fixed to the corners of a square that is 1.0 cm on a side. Three of the charges are positive and one is negative. Determine the magnitude of the net electric field that exists at the center of the square.

#2:
The magnitude of each of the charges in the figure is 7.50 10-12 C. The lengths of the sides of the rectangle are 3.00 cm and 4.50 cm. Find the magnitude of the electric field at the center of the rectangle in figures a and b.

Homework Equations


E = k q/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so i have been ALL over the forums here and looking at other examples and still nto getting it. I am on my final response...i am normally very smart so i don't get why i am sucking in this section.

#1:
I looked at it and said that the two positive forces opposite each other would negate each other leaving only the negative charge and the one positive charge across from it.

With that I said E = k*6.8e-12/ (1/2 of 1 * sqrt(2) since it is a half of a diagonal in a square)

i got .1224 for each charge...added the two together and it was wrong. I also tried an instance where i did it with all 4...so it was 4 * k * q / (.5*sqrt(2)) that was wrong too...


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you convert from cm to m and still get the wrong answer? Your work looks right except you didn't convert to m... so I think it should be 1224 N/C for one charge... and using both charges the answer is 2448 N/C.
 
Ah ha! yes apparently the one thing I didn't do was check for stupid mistakes on this one :)

Any chance you can give me some guidance on the 2nd part? Thanks!
 
Hmmm... I'm confused by the 2nd question... Are there 4 equal charges at the four corners of the rectangle? Or is it 3 positive charges and 1 negative charge like the first part?
 
It is two parts:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=124995
this thread has the pictures.


I understand it is E = kq / r^2...

a) i pythagorean theoremed the hypoteneuse... so (1.5^2 + 2.25^2)^.5 = 2.704 cm
2.704 / 100 = .02704 m

8.99e9 7.5e-12 / (.02704^2) = 92.31 N/C x 2 (for the other side as well) => 184.4 N/C (already got this one correct)

b)
is it just 92.31 x 4 (already tried and that is wrong, but i knew it wasn't the right use of the principals anyways)?

The other thread doesnt' really talk about part B (the one with the 2 negative and 2 positive charges).

The only other thing i can think of is that you calculate the charge like you do in part A for each side...and then you use those two * cos (30) to get the resultant E vector?

so 369 * cos(30) = 319.4 N/C

Thanks!
 
For part b)... the horizontal components all cancel... take the vertical component of the field due to one charge... then multiply by 4... the angle isn't 30...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top