Electric Field Strength Conservation in Direction of Motion

StateOfTheEqn
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
(Sorry for the typo in the title. I don't know how to get rid of it)

Recently I was looking at the Lorentz co-variance of F=dA (the Faraday 2-form) and *F=*dA (the Maxwell 2-form). I realized that Lorentz co-variance implies that the electric field strength and magnetic field strength are invariant in the direction of motion. In Einstein's notation in Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper (Engl trans.:ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES), X=X' and L=L'. It struck me as interesting that he had to assume the invariance in order to prove the co-variance of Maxwell's equations:

Maxwell's eqns:
img78.gif


transformed:

img79.gif


and now in the new variables:
img86.gif


Notice how he assumes X=X' and L=L'. This was no small assumption since it was at the time something Poincare was wanting to prove. The proof is, it seems, because it is necessary to establish co-variance, an established fact by then - otherwise you could measure the absolute velocity of the Earth through the luminiferous aether.

Further along he states explicitly:

img93.gif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's simply the transformation law for a 2nd-rank tensor,
F'^{\mu \nu}={\Lambda^{\mu}}_{\rho} {\Lambda^{\nu}}_{\sigma} F^{\rho \sigma}.
Plugging in the components in 1+3-dimensional notation, i.e., for \mu \in \{1,2,3 \}
F^{0 \mu}=\partial^{0} A^{\mu}-\partial^{\mu} A^0=\partial_0 A^{\mu} + \partial_{\mu} A^0=\dot{A}^{\mu}+\partial_{\mu} \Phi=-E^{\mu},
and for \mu,\nu \in \{1,2,3 \}
F^{\mu \nu}=\partial^{\mu} A^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu} A^{\mu}=-\partial_{\mu} A^{\nu} + \partial_{\nu} A^{\mu}=\epsilon^{\nu \mu \rho} B^{\rho},
you find the transformation law in terms of (\vec{E},\vec{B}) for a boost,
<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \vec{E}&#039;&amp;=\gamma(\vec{E}+\vec{\beta} \times \vec{B})-\frac{\gamma^2}{1+\gamma} \vec{\beta}(\vec{\beta} \cdot \vec{E}),\\<br /> \vec{B}&#039;&amp;=\gamma(\vec{B}-\vec{\beta} \times \vec{E})-\frac{\gamma^2}{1+\gamma} \vec{\beta}(\vec{\beta} \cdot \vec{B}),<br /> \end{split}<br />
where \vec{\beta}=\vec{v}/c and \gamma=1/\sqrt{1-\vec{\beta}^2}. As you see, the components in boost direction are indeed unchanged.

Projecting to the parts in direction of \vec{\beta} and perpendicular to it gives
<br /> \begin{split}<br /> \vec{E}_{\parallel}&#039;&amp;=\vec{E}_{\parallel},\\<br /> \vec{B}_{\parallel}&#039;&amp;=\vec{B}_{\parallel},\\<br /> \vec{E}_{\perp}&#039;&amp;=\gamma(\vec{E}_{\perp}+\vec{\beta} \times \vec{B}),\\<br /> \vec{B}_{\perp}&#039;&amp;=\gamma(\vec{B}_{\perp}-\vec{\beta} \times \vec{E}).<br /> \end{split}<br />
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top