Electric field with dielectric

chrishans
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


There's a ring of radius R with linear uniform charge density \lambda=constant (which includes both free charges and polarization charges). The ring is in a dielectric region with \varepsilon_r. I have to find the electric field on any point of the axis of the ring

Homework Equations


\vec E=\int \frac{\lambda dl (\vec r - \vec r')}{| \vec r - \vec r' | ^3}

The Attempt at a Solution



I actually don't know and coulnd't find anywhere if I can calculate the electric field using the above formula when \lambda includes free AND polarization charges.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there a coefficient missing in your equation ?
 
No, that's all I have. Since I'm given a linear density for the ring which includes free and polarization charges, I assume it's a dielectric, but I don't know its coefficient. With that density which includes polarization charges, is it ok to calculate the electric field, like in the formula I wrote before?
 
Since the ring is submerged in a dielectric region with εr, the Electric field decreases by a factor of εr.
So E' = E/εr, where E is the magnitude of the field without the dielectric, and E' with dielectric.
Now take an infinitely small section on the circumference on the ring, dl. The charge associated is dq=λdl.
The field associated with dq is 1/4piε (dq/r^2). However, since the ring is symmetric, the x-component of the net electric field, which is perpendicular to the axis, cancels out. Now all you need to consider is the y component. The y component of the field is Ey= E'cos(theta), where theta is the angle made between the axis, and the field vector coming from dq. Set "z" as the distance along the axis from the center of the circle. You can find cos(theta) using a relationship between "z" and "R", with the use of pythagorean theorem. Also, when you intergrate with respect to dl, change dl to Rd(theta). Integrate all contributions of dq from 0 to 2pi (because it is a circle) and you should be able to find the electric field anywhere along the axis. I understand that this is a sloppy description, but I hope this help anyways.
 
It should be fine to calculate it treating it as free charges, because your density does include polarization charges.
 
chrishans said:
No, that's all I have. Since I'm given a linear density for the ring which includes free and polarization charges, I assume it's a dielectric, but I don't know its coefficient. With that density which includes polarization charges, is it ok to calculate the electric field, like in the formula I wrote before?
Strange. i seem to remember that
\vec E= {1\over 4\pi\epsilon_0}\int \frac{\lambda dl (\vec r - \vec r')}{| \vec r - \vec r' | ^3}in vacuum. In a medium it would be ##{1\over 4\pi\epsilon}## with ##\epsilon=\epsilon_0 \epsilon_r##, but I could be mistaken. So check.
There is nothing in ##\lambda## that has to do with stuff outside the ring. No change in ##\lambda##, whatever ##\epsilon_r##.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top