Electric fields of wool and silk

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric fields at three points between two charged plastic sheets, one with a surface charge density of n1=-n0 and the other with n2=3n0. The electric field equations for infinite sheets are applied, specifically E=n/(2ε0), to derive the fields at each point. At point 1, the net electric field is calculated as E1=2(n0/ε0), while at point 2, it is E2=n0/ε0, and at point 3, it returns to E3=2(n0/ε0). A key point of confusion arises from vector addition and the need to consider both the magnitude and direction of the electric fields. The final consensus emphasizes the importance of correctly applying vector principles and ensuring that both magnitude and direction are included in the calculations.
Cakiemmatdo
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
You've hung two very large sheets of plastic facing each other with distance d between them . By rubbing them with wool and silk, you've managed to give one sheet a uniform surface charge density n1=-n0 and the other a uniform surface charge density n2=3n0 .



Homework Statement


Find the electric fields at point 1, point 2, point 3 in term of numberical multiple of the factor (no/Eo)
Point 1 is the left, point 2 is in the middle of the two sheets, and point 3 is to the right




Homework Equations


E=1/(4piEo) *Q/R^2

E (parrallel capacitor) = Q/(EoA) or E=no/Eo


The Attempt at a Solution


I think of using equation for electric fields to solve it and then realize we don't have distance to use, but neither the equation for parrallel capacitor works

Thanks for the helps
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know Gauss' law? If so you can calculate the electric field of a single sheet without too much hassle. Hint: The electric field for the parallel plate capacitor is almost correct. Now remember that you can add fields vectorial and note that the strength of the field does not depend on distance.
Draw the sheets on a piece of paper, mark which one is negative and which one is positive then draw electric field vectors in each of the areas.
 
So I set up the electric field vectors and everything
I assume that the two large sheets are infinity large so its electric fields will be the same regardless to the distance, also I'm using equation E= n/ (2Eo)

Point 1: We have E_n_1 points to the right (due to the negative charge of sheet 1) while E_n_2 points to the left and since plate 2 has bigger charge, E_n_2 will be longer than E_n_1===> E_1 = E_n_2-E_n_1

Point 2: Similarly, I found E_2=E_n_2+E_n_1 (since both pointint to the left)
Point 3: Similarly, I found E_3=E_n_2-E_n_1

Then using E_n=n/ (2Eo) to calculate E_n_1 and E_n_2 then figure out E_1, E_2, E_3 in term of n0/Eo which gave me
Point 1= 2 (n0/Eo)=Point 3
Point 2=1 (n0/Eo)

I don't know what I do wrong, but MP doesn't accept my answer. Is this a right way to archive this problem, or maybe I'm making mistakes in vector addition
 
While you listed the correct electric field I think that in your calculation you accidentally still used the electric field for the parallel plate capacitor. This is what you should have done \frac{-n_0}{2 \epsilon_0}+\frac{3n_0}{2 \epsilon_0}=\frac{n_0}{\epsilon_0}. You seem to have made the same mistake for point 2. Also keep in mind that we are talking about vectors and what you've done so far is calculate the magnitude of the E-fields. MP might want you to also include the direction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top