Electric Flux Through a Hole in a Sphere?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric flux through a drilled hole in a nonconductive hollow sphere surrounding a charge. The initial solution calculated the flux using the electric field strength multiplied by the area of the hole, leading to confusion due to differing results from the textbook, which states the total flux through a sphere is 4*k*q*pi. The discrepancy arises from misunderstanding the relationship between the total flux and the flux through a smaller area. The correct approach involves using the ratio of the areas to determine the flux through the aperture. Ultimately, understanding the geometric implications of the calculations is crucial for accurate results.
PosteMortem
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An uncharged nonconductive hollow sphere of radius 12.0 cm surrounds a 11.0 µC charge located at the origin of a cartesian coordinate system. A drill with a radius of 1.00 mm is aligned along the z axis, and a hole is drilled in the sphere. Calculate the electric flux through the hole.

Homework Equations


Flux=EA

The Attempt at a Solution


I've got the solution for this problem. I found the flux for the sphere to be equal to (kq/r^2)*(pi*r^2)=k*q*pi, and after multiplying that value by the ratio of the smaller radius squared to the larger radius squared, I got the answer. However, I was reading the textbook, and it shows the flux through a sphere to be equal to 4*k*q*pi, the reason being that integrating over the entire surface will give us the surface area of a sphere. I'm confused as to how these two answers could be different. Shouldn't it be the same in both cases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Check the units of each. One is a flux, the other a field strength.

What motivated you multiply the electric field strength by ##\pi r^2##? It provided a correction factor, but it seems geometrically unmotivated at first glance (at least to me). A bit of algebra shows that it will work if you use the ratio of radii squared as a multiplier to select the amount of flux, but one is the radius of a volume and the other a radius of an area. Not exactly intuitive. Nothing succeeds like success, I suppose! But what would you have done if the hole happened to be a square punched in the surface?

When you start with the total flux over a spherical surface and want to know the flux that comes through some small aperture at the surface you multiply the total flux by the ratio of the total surface area to the area of the aperture.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top