Electric Force problem -> Infinite charged plane with hole

moonrkr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Electric Force problem --> Infinite charged plane with hole

The plane is infinite charged. It has a charge density (σ) of 10nC/m^{2}. If R=5cm, determine the electric force of a proton in the point P=(0,0,10cm).

eje2.jpg

=====================================================================



MY set UP:
I was thinking about using E=σ/2*ε_{o}
and use F=Eq.
I can see problems in the book with the infinite charged plane, but they don't have a hole thru it... PLEASE HELP>>>!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


moonrkr said:
The plane is infinite charged. It has a charge density (σ) of 10nC/m^{2}. If R=5cm, determine the electric force of a proton in the point P=(0,0,10cm).

eje2.jpg

=====================================================================



MY set UP:
I was thinking about using E=σ/2*ε_{o}
and use F=Eq.
I can see problems in the book with the infinite charged plane, but they don't have a hole thru it... PLEASE HELP>>>!

Consider the hole as a combination of positive and negative charges.
 


You can face this problem at least in two ways:
1) Calculate explicitly the force with the Coulomb expression \vec{F}=\frac{q_1q_2}{4\pi\epsilon r^2}
2) Solve the problem "geometrically": how do you build a charged plane with a hole? You can think either \vec{F}_{positively\,charged\,plane\,with\,hole}=\vec{F}_{positively\,charged\,plane\,without\,hole}-\vec{F}_{field\,of\,the\,hole} or \vec{F}_{positively\,charged\,plane\,with\,hole}=\vec{F}_{positively\,charged\,plane\,without\,hole}+\vec{F}_{negatively\,charged\,hole}

Both ways, you should be careful, because the symmetry of the problem allows you to do powerful simplifications on the components of the forces acting on the proton.
 


Force of the hole - Force of the plane (without hole) = Force of the entire setting(plane with hole)?
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top