Electric & Magnetic fields - inner product

AI Thread Summary
Electric and magnetic fields are not always perpendicular; they are only perpendicular in specific cases like plane waves. The inner product of the two vectors, E·B, is zero only for these traveling waves with constant wave fronts. In general scenarios, such as near charged capacitor plates and current-carrying solenoids, the electric and magnetic fields can be parallel. Additionally, the quantity |B|^2 - (1/c^2)|E|^2 is significant in electrodynamics, as it is invariant under Lorentz transformations, making it a Lorentz scalar. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing electromagnetic fields in various contexts.
thehangedman
Messages
68
Reaction score
2
I have read that the electric and magnetic fields are always "perpendicular". Is that true? And if so, does that mean the inner product of the two vectors is zero?

E_x * B_x + E_y * B_y + E_z * B_z = 0 ?


Also, is there any special meaning in electrodynamics to the quantity:

| B |^2 - 1/c^2 | E |^2

where | B |^2 = B_x * B_x + B_y * B_y + B_z * B_z
and | E |^2 = E_x * E_x + E_y * E_y + E_z * E_z

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Answer to the first question is no, E and B are perpendicular in a plane wave, but not in general.

Answer to the second question is yes! There are two quantities associated with the electromagnetic field that are invariant under a Lorentz transformation. One is E·B, the other is E2 - B2. These are Lorentz scalars. Calculate them in one frame and they'll continue to have the same value in every other frame.
 
They are only perpendicular for traveling waves with constant wave fronts, such as plane waves, spherical waves, cylindrical waves, etc. If you place the plates of charged a capacitor near each end of a current-carrying solenoid, the electric field is parallel to the magnetic field.
 
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top